On May 26, a user on HP’s support forums reported that a forced, automatic BIOS update had bricked their HP ProBook 455 G7 into an unusable state. Subsequently, other users have joined the thread to sound off about experiencing the same issue.

This common knowledge regarding BIOS software would, then, seem to make automatic, forced BIOS updates a real issue, even if it weren’t breaking anything. Allowing the user to manually install and prepare their systems for a BIOS update is key to preventing issues like this.

At the time of writing, HP has made no official comment on the matter — and since this battery update was forced on laptops originally released in 2020, this issue has also bricked hardware outside of the warranty window, when previously users could simply send in the laptop for a free repair.

Overall, this isn’t a very good look for HP, particularly its BIOS update practices. The fragility of BIOS software should have tipped off the powers at be at HP about the lack of foresight in this release model, and now we’re seeing it in full force with forced, bugged BIOS updates that kill laptops.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The idea of forced automatic BIOS update is dumb. BIOS only should initialize its required components and fuck off afterwards.

  • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    On the offhand chance that someone with a bricked HP laptop stumbles here looking for what to do (prob via smartphone or public library computer),

    • I’d recommend on removing the M.2 SSD (gumslice-shaped PCB that contains your data) to protect your data
      • this can be found by googling your laptop’s serial number and looking for the manual, after downloading the PDF file you’ll be able to open it with Firefox
      • you’ll typically need a philips-head screwdriver to remove the laptop’s case and remove the SSD

    I’m assuming the users might be coming from Windows

    hopefully this helps someone out there

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d strongly recommend against that at this point since it will be useless without your Bitlocker key form the laptop’s TPM.

        • breakingcups@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          When did you last check the statistic you just pulled from your ass? Bitlocker is on by default on all machines that support it, which is all pc’s and laptops being sold the past few years.

          The only exception used to be when you bypass oobe to create a local user account, which also isn’t supported anymore.

          • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Part of my job description includes repairing PCs. I see quite a lot of them over the course of a month. I also set up lots of new PCs for people when they buy them. All I see Bitlocker enabled on by default are Surface devices and the occasional Lenovo laptop/tablet hybrid POS. So I pulled that statistic from my own personal observations.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Even if it isn’t “bitlocker” branded, most Windows PCs ship with “BitLocker” enabled. The distinction between Windows Home disk encryption and “BitLocker” is that BitLocker additionally allows external management of the key material, while Home only supports the TPM and your microsoft account for the key/recovery codes.

          • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            most Windows PCs ship with “BitLocker” enabled

            No, they simply do not. Microsoft branded hardware, sure. But I’ve never seen a Dell or an HP with Bitlocker enabled from the factory, and at this point I’ve put my hands on thousands of them.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I can tell you every factory preload of windows on a Lenovo I have seen for the past few years has disk encryption on by default (windows home, so not “bitlocker”, but it’s the same thing with respect to being tied to TPM.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They don’t play well with Linux. Occasionally my HP laptop will turn back on SecureBoot with no warning. There’s also like a full minute of delay between opening the thing and keyboard strokes registering. (Iirc, HP is so Linux hostile it’s not really supported by Arch)

      • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mine will start immediately after shutting down. I have never found a solution other than holding the power button

    • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it’s not a touchscreen, it’s fairly easy to repair. Still shouldn’t have broke in the first place, but it’s just the back panel cover.

      I’ve repaired hundreds of laptops across multiple vendors on all kinds of damage, fwiw.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Touchscreens are also easy to repair, they just have two more wires in the ribbon, that’s all.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, agree. But it doesn’t have to be that way. Some companies are just lazy, sadly.

            • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              There’s been a few models I’ve tried repairing in the field, and it would have required a likely damaging of the end of the WiFi antenna wires (at the very least). Some will have this effectively thick copper tape that’s soldered onto the end of the WiFi wires, and the glue is very aggressive.

              And again, some you can peel off without too much trouble, but some not as easily. Granted the vast majority of my repairs were onsite at the customers home/business.

  • Takios@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember warning labels on BIOS updates that basically said that if nothing is broken, don’t do the update because the risk of bricking the device did not outweigh any potential benefits. That vendors are now pushing mandatory BIOS updates through Windows Update is terrifying.

    • far_university1990@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why can even touch bios from system? That sound like horrible attack vector. If can infect bios, no reformat or reinstall will remove virus.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      When I heard that BIOS updates were going out automatically via Windows update I had just assumed the devices in question must be using an A/B update scheme to prevent the risk of accidentally bricking the system, because obviously they should.

      Absolutely insane that’s not the case.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What does a motherboard BIOS have to do with Windows other than that was how the update was delivered? I swear Lemmy loves to shoehorn Linux into any article that even mentions Windows.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    No one should buy HP products anymore. Seriously everything they make is terrible and then they break it more when they get bored of you and want you to buy another one.

    • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thing is, all the other major manufacturers are just as bad or worse.

      As a PC technician, HP still somehow has the best service and support, which speaks volumes about how bad everyone else is. Dell’s support tools are a generation behind HP’s, and Lenovo’s build quality is atrocious. Not to mention Lenovo’s technician support is so badly fragmented and poorly run, they default to having the customer send the device in for repair and avoid sending an on-site technician just so they can avoid dealing with technician support. Speaking from personal experience, getting to the right person when I have a problem or need to order additional parts is like pulling teeth, and even if I manage to reach someone, they’re usually equal parts incompetent and unhelpful.

      And Apple doesn’t even want to service their stuff.

      These days, you have to pick your poison.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The article doesn’t say/clarify. Was it some crap HP software that performs driver updates, and it decided to force a bios flash? Or was it windows update itself?

    If it was windows itself, holy crap, that’s a serious over reach on Microsoft’s part. Like “this is insanity windows needs to be removed” bad.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Years ago Windows used to not provide drivers. This lead to many users never downloading drivers for their devices. Users ran their devices for years without trackpad, Wifi and GPU drivers etc. The drivers were also scattered all over the internet.

      These days vendors can supply Windows with drivers and even Bios updates.

      It is very unlikely Microsoft pushed these drivers out themselves. HP likely provided the Bios update…

  • fury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    How do these things not have unbrickable A/B firmware partitions by now? Even I have that on a $2 microcontroller. Self-test doesn’t pass after an update? Instant automatic rollback to the previous working partition.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s pretty ridiculous not to have a way of recovering from a failed update.

      On my desktop, I just have to plug a flash drive with the BIOS image into a specific USB port and press a button on the motherboard. It doesn’t matter if the BIOS is broken and it doesn’t even require a CPU or RAM to be installed.

    • tibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Microsoft should also be to blame here. Sending BIOS updates via automatic windows updates should not be a thing.

        • Voyajer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not sure when the sentiment changed, but it used to be heavily recommended against updating the bios on any computer unless there was a specific feature or fix your computer needed.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sentiment changed when the “BIOS” became a component for enforcing security architecture via “SecureBoot” and also Bitlocker sealed to PCRs only does so much if the BIOS code is vulnerable. Now they really badly want a “trusted” chain from some root of trust until the OS bootloader takes over. Problem is that the developers have historically enjoyed being in a trusted, single user context for decades and so the firmware has been full of holes when actually pushed.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is a classical example of user error.

    They made the easily preventable mistake of buying HP.