• Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    So basically the corporate equivalent of slipping a traffic cop a $100, then him conveniently deciding that you’re free to go.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      More like seventy five cents, given Google’s profit margins.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s more like paying the ticket without ever showing up in court. And at least where I live, I can do that.

      • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        No - it’s actually not like that at all.

        Google didn’t pay that money just to bypass the formalities along the way to paying a fixed fine - they paid it in order to head off the possibility that they were going to face a jury trial instead of a bench trial, since juries are far more likely to vote in favor of much bigger fines than judges are.

  • Brewchin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “This is illegal!”

    Bung in the post

    “This is legal… for a fee!”

    If the punishment is a fine, it is targeted at those who can’t afford the brib—I mean fee.