- cross-posted to:
- programming@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- programming@beehaw.org
You must log in or # to comment.
CEO: why not both?
Shareholders: why not all three?
Considering that C-suite executives are usually fantastically expensive, they’d be a logical position to automate (assuming AI worked like suits think it does). For some veeeery strange reason no board of directors has suggested replacing themselves with AIs
Sounds like they’re not prioritizing the shareholders interests! Last I heard, that’s a fireable offense!
It’s almost like the rules don’t apply to the moneyed class
If we fire all developers and allow AIs to program themselves, the AIs are going to commit virtual seppuku after a few days.
Managers might not like people but they don’t want to get rid of them. There’s no cheap thrill from micromanaging an AI.
Plus it’s harder to pass the buck and blame an AI for your screw ups. It would be perceived, as the kids say, as a skills issue.
