• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Cage is peak trek

    Never accepted Kirk and those after as real trek

    • Corgana@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You better be referring to the original broadcast recorded to magnetic tape and not the abomination that is the DVD release

      • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        What about the option of the original black and white recording of ‘The Cage’ with the colour portions from ‘The Menagerie’ spliced in, as released to videotape in thr 80s?

        That was the real Star Trek. Roddenberry even took it to cons in the 70s and 80s to let fans know what he really wanted to put on the air.

  • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’re fooling yourself if you don’t want to see the sharp decrease in quality post DS9. The best Trek series of the last 25 years is Orville ffs

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t mind the Kelvin films. Karl Urban as Bones makes it all worth while.

    They’re just popcorn flicks. Watch or don’t watch and it’s not like the Star Trek Universe is altered in any way. (Also, those movies are better than everything after Wrath of Khan, movie-wise)

    • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I used to think Chris Pine Kirk was better than Shatner. I now kind of feel like Pine’s the best Captain, but SNW Kirk’s the best gentlemanly lady killer kirk.

    • Soulcreator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d argue they are better than anything after The Undiscovered Country. But yeah otherwise I agree, 2009 is one of my top trek films, and I’d rather watch it over any of the TNG movies. Sorry, not sorry.

    • d13@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Largely agree, with a couple exceptions: Undiscovered Country and First Contact are good; Into Darkness is bad.

  • Takeshidude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve taken to the term 3rd-wave Trek for the 2010s-present shows to identify the stylistic differences in production compared to shows made in the 80s-90s or 60s.

    Each era is molded by the media conventions of it’s time. And there I go reinventing Marshal McLuhan again: “the medium is the message”

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Where do you put ENT? I say it feels very different from the not much earlier VOY but not as a wave in its own right. And while we’re at it: TAS

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the good take. Star Trek peaked at DS9 and there’s yet to be a good reason to continue past it.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah yes, “my opinion is infallible and I’m righteous for screaming it from the rooftops, but your opposing opinion is ignorant and worthy of dismissal!”

          Red flag indeed, friend.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Never liked VOY, writing is poor… Not interesting sci-fi like TNG, not a captivating story like DS9…
        The Doctor is essentially the only good part. Maybe Seven of Nine, Jery Ryan is a great actress, despite the embarrassing clothing.

        SNW is good, DIS is whack. PIC essentially crapped all over the past series’ development, killed Hugh, Ro, Icheb, made the Federation grimdark… Monk Worf was cool tho.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          Voyager’s writing is inconsistent. There’s some fantastic episodes… and then there’s salamanders.

          • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            True, but the feeling is that in general Voyager was hard to watch.

            I rewatched TNG and DS9 several times from start to finish and almost skipped no episodes (though in later rewatches of DS9 I’m skipping the alternate universe ones since I can’t bear them). I tried rewatching VOY and I just can’t. Sure I can rewatch some of the awesome episodes from the show, but I can’t watch it from start to finish since I find most episodes to be cringey (even if I like most of the actors and their characters, but something doesn’t work when watching entire episodes).

            Unrelated: I watched DIS until it was on Netflix (and deemed it an action TV series that’s got nothing to do with Star Trek) and watched only a few episodes of PIC until it turned into the “fellowship of the ring” with the introduction of a sword wielding elf. Should I squeeze my nose and dive into it again and try to finish it?

            I’ll watch SNW as soon as I can. Still haven’t gotten around it

            • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Discovery started off as an action show, then suddenly added 10 minute long unrelated montages in the middle of action scenes. That killed it for me.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              TNG I would skip most of Season 1 and probably a decent chunk of Season 2 on a rewatch.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              VOY episodes just leave you with nothing. Sure, stuff happened, but… you feel like it doesn’t matter. It’s sad because they had the chance to really make something cool, 5-year-exploration missions pale in comparison to travelling back from the other side of the galaxy.

              You can watch the last season of PIC, it’s essentially a noir-action show in a scifi setting, but… WATCH SNW NOW!

          • Alex@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m watching Voyager with my kids. Janeway is pretty bad ass given her position as the sole federation representative in the delta sector. We are however using a watchlist and skipping the filler episodes rather than going for the completionist approach.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Janeway has Q powers, she gets into all kinds of shit she has no chance of getting out, and she just… does, somehow. It’s really bad writing… Plus Voyager is ALWAYS getting disabled! WTF, you guys should stay away from encounters, that ship is made of glass… even tho they, again, succeed somehow in the end.

            • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s a very correct point of view. Janeway IS cool and the show had such potential, but there are so many wasted opportunities…

    • Corgana@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      As long as you don’t take every available opportunity to steer every single online conversation towards how you don’t like a tv show then we’re cool

        • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          But they did share it and were cool about it. It’s people who say stuff like “this is shit and people who like it are shit” that need to cool their jets.

  • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s the face for anyone who remembers that by TOS canon, the greek god Apollo is real and just got bored of Earth and fucked off to another planet?

  • SGG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    What if I say all trek is both NuTrek and OldTrek because accidental time travel

  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Based on a real situation I encountered once: Normal Star Trek Fan: Yeh, I like Seven of Nine.

    “Red flag” Star Trek Fan: I like Seven of Nine.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, technically everything from TNG onwards would be NuTrek and Kelvin-stuff would be NuNuTrek, or rather Re-Trek, since it’s a reboot.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      NuTrek started when they did a full visual reboot, including completely changing the look of the Klingons: TMP.

      Then it got worse, when they followed that up with a grimdark shoot-em-up that felt nothing like Trek. These people aren’t even fans of the show!

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        completely changing the look of the Klingons

        You are talking about the TOS movies/TNG? Never understand the forehead thing either

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, I’m facetiously comparing the 1979 arguments over bumpy headed Klingons to the 2017 arguments over cone headed Klingons. What’s “new” keeps on changing, but the arguments about it stay eerily familiar.

      • livingcoder@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who wanted a visual reboot of the Klingons?

        Discovery had so many problems for me: ship flies on magic mushrooms, her mom basically doesn’t care about her anymore by the end of it - the show-starting plot line, and the Klingons look like sweaty orcs.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, who wanted this visual reboot of the Klingons between old trek and nutrek?

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What’s wrong with the magic mushrooms? It’s not like Trek was ever hard sci-fi when it came to how the ships fly. For crying out loud, in Voyager they went so fast they were everywhere at once, then Tom Paris and Janeway had salamander babies.

          • livingcoder@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            It just felt so cliche, that the crazy discovery they make is that the strange stuff is alive. The writers couldn’t make it sentient because then they’d need to explain why it’s just like the Great Lake but different from the Great Lake. It just exists and Star Fleet happens to be the only ones who know about it.

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Who wanted a visual reboot of the Klingons?

          Gene Roddenberry, I guess. IMO the guy really fell off when he turned Trek into a saturday morning cartoon show. But yeah, sweaty orc is right, just look at these monstrosities:

          • livingcoder@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            lol, I love that you’re conflating the creator having the budget to make the show more in-line with his original vision with someone else making a lousy change for no clear reason. It’s a nice knee-slapper of a comment you have right there. Good luck with it.

            • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              TV and movie productions are collaborative efforts undertaken by a huge number of creative people, and I don’t think any of them make their decisions for no reason. The “original creator” of the Klingons was Gene L. Coon, who had nothing to do with their portrayal in TMP.

                • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That footnote points to an uncredited trekplace article from 2004 that itself has no citations. There was never an “original vision" that Klingons have bumpy heads, that was an idea entirely original to TMP.

                  Anyway, how do we feel about the Star Trek III redesign? In TMP it was one hairless bump that was supposed to represent a spinal column, running all the way from the back over the cranium. TSFS and onward, suddenly it was a flatter, wider set of ridges that was localized only to the forehead, with a full head of hair behind it. For some reason I’m always seeing people act like those are the same design, but to me the differences are glaringly obvious.

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    maybe I’ve consumed more and more scifi over the years to compare to or maybe the later releases of trek have lowered the average in my mind but I can’t help but see trek in general as solidly mid now

    • alansuspect@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hadn’t watched any Trek in a while and in Picard there was a scene where their ship was hit and started listing like a boat and I was like “that’s not how space works!”, then remembered that’s the thing with Star Trek.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, once your have artificial gravity… why wouldn’t it suck just like normal gravity?

        People lurch around the bridge because some photon torpedo rocked the “down is this way” machine.

        • alansuspect@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh inside the ship definitely, but outside space doesn’t have a down. If a photon torpedo really hit the front it would push the ship backwards, not to the front and down. But it’s ok, it’s just a bit of fun 🚀

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I didn’t really like TOS (except the movies, those were great) was a big TNG fan (not the movies though, didn’t like those), I loved DS9, I was okay with Voyager and basically did not care for anything after, except maybe Lower Decks? Haven’t seen SNW yet, will give it a try.

    But all of that is just like, my opinion man, you go watch whatever gives you the good feels, I’ll not police your opinion.

    Except if you like Discovery-Klingons, liking those makes you a garbage-human!🚩

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except if you like Discovery-Klingons, liking those makes you a garbage-human!

      I was baffled about why their appearance was changed (again), but really hated the insistence on subs. I understand when I’m watching a movie and there is a scene in France that the characters are not actually speaking English with a French accent, it is translated for me for ease of viewing.

      I like to have the option of doing things in the background when watching TV (Tidying up, making food, grinding something in a game, etc) and the insistence on using subs means the least interesting part of the show demanded my full attention.

  • bblkargonaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I will always have a special place in my heart for the Kevin timeline because it was my gateway drug to the good stuff. I wound up watching all of Star Trek in chronical order enterprise to Voyager.