• underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    could you explain to me how the anxious, starving crowd of people trying to reach aid “started” it?

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you suggesting an anxious crowd couldn’t have started trampling eachother or couldn’t have caused the drivers to panic?

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Are you suggesting that an anxious crowd devolving into a panic is improved by the addition of weapons fire?

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          4 months ago

          If that is what happened, why would the article in the OP lie about it?

          Why would you brush off these lies as unimportant?

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Lie about what? Nothing in the article contradicts what I’ve said. Even if you buy the bit about Israel firing “warning shots” after the panic had already started, they still created this entire situation to begin with. They starved those people then tossed in some scraps and shot at them when they reacted pretty much exactly how any rational person would expect. It doesn’t fucking matter if most of the bodies don’t have IDF bullets lodged in them. They killed them all the same.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              4 months ago

              Above, you arrive at the suggestion that if the IDF was firing off warning shots, this could have set off a panic/stampede through the crowd and the trucks driving. but this would still mean that the IDF was largely responsible through this chain of events. Which I certainly agree with.

              But the article says something completely different. It suggests the IDF waited for these victims to gather around the aid trucks and says they then opened fire on them. With artillery, drone missiles and gunfire. It mentions nothing about people being trampled or run over by trucks.

              You don’t see a little bit of contradiction there?

              • underisk@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                My dude I’m not arriving at any conclusion about what specifically happened. I saying even the most favorable interpretation toward Israel is damning. It doesn’t matter when or how they shot into the crowd, the only reason a starving crowd on the edge of panic existed in the first place is because Israel created it. That, for me, is enough to lay all the deaths at their feet regardless of whether they were shot, trampled, or run over.

                If you’re concerned that I might be taking Israel at their word for some reason, let me assure you: I do not buy their version of events for even a second.