After reading today EA’s takes on AI and strategies about boosting user monetization promoting and exploitation of user’s gambling addiction, I asked myself “How can someone defend those company agains boycotting and piracy?”.

So here I am: is there somewhere a curated list of VG companies to absolutely avoid giving money too? If not, do you thing we should do it? It would be nice to have a list with arguments and sources in order to make more publicly relevant the ethical and strateical reasons behind piracy.

p.s.I think it’s ok if you pirate things even without a moral stand behind, especially if you can’t afford games and other media at all, but the arguments still apply

    • Eggyhead@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m already not much of a Ubisoft fan, but wasn’t this just a response to a question about what would need to happen for subscriptions to take off? What should have been said? In context, it’s more of a hypothetical than an imperative.

      Context doesn’t make for good clickbait, though.

      • skye@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Are you saying that Ubisoft doesn’t actually believe that people shouldn’t own their games and that this was a hypothetical discussion that was taken out of context? Because my impression was that this was sort of a response to people complaining about subscription-based games and DRM content that makes the concept of owning games blurry.

        Because if this position doesn’t really represent Ubisoft, then what should have been said is whatever does represent Ubisoft. Ideally they should agree that people have the right own the games they purchase.

        In my opinion someone should generally own what they buy. That’s why I like GOG, which distributes DRM free games, and part of why I often pirate games especially from large companies. In my opinion the take that people should only have a license representing permission to use a product that is actually owned by a company is delusional if not dystopian, and Ubisoft should be made fun of for having that position, and their games should be pirated.

        Here’s an explanation/rant/opinion I more or less agree with by Louis Rossmann if you’re/anyone’s interested

        • Eggyhead@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Are you saying that Ubisoft doesn’t actually believe that people shouldn’t own their games and…

          No

          that this was a hypothetical discussion that was taken out of context?

          Yes

  • Hurculina Drubman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism. you kind of have to make your peace with that and steal when you can

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    For simplicity, I have it in regex format

    .+
    

    Jokes aside, Nintendo, EA, Ubisoft, Nintendo, Activision-blizzard and Nintendo are the ones that come to mind.

    If indi and plays well on deck, I’m generally on paying.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Do you not know about Sony’s sordid past?

      Google ‘Geohot ps3’. Then google ‘Sony rootkit CDs’.

      George Hotz was the first person who jail broke a ps3. and taught others how to do it, until Sony sued him. Then anonymous fucked Sony, hard. like really hard.

      https://youtu.be/66A4zcJaPLk

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    EA, Ubisoft, Nintendo, Sony(particularly, Sony if youre buying digital, Sony doesnt give a shit if your purchases suddenly go ”missing")

    • quirzle@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you only consider monetary cost, you can get anything free.

      If you consider risk, opportunity, and effort, nothing is free.

      For your statement to be literally true, you must either buy literally everything or literally nothing depending on your perspective.