I’ve worked with some pretty rotten software, but management software is easily the most user unfriendly, so my vote goes to HPSM.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Due to really dumb requirements we had an app that used Python, Visual basic, C and C++, MATLAB, R and JavaScript. I’m not describing an application stack. This was a single binary. The amalgamation was so disturbing that it couldn’t even shut down once run, instead asking the operating system to please, please kill me.

    Part of the installation procedure involves disabling all SSL certificate verification on company machines.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Didn’t leave the job over it, but SAP.

    Shitty. Ass. Program.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, fucking Business Objects was the bane of my existence. The worst situations were where the creator of the report used their shitty GUI joins instead of actually writing a SQL load script. It made troubleshooting that much more annoying.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Their GUI is so bad. You had to have lookup tables printed out with various codes to find anything instead of, you know, being able to search for them.

        I’ve used a lot of software in my life and this one is by far the worst.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That was one of two that came to mind(a long with Oracle’s Peoplesoft). I was an HR department of one, no training, no documentation, no one who knew how it should work for HR. I often cited it, along with Peoplesoft for the explosion of solutions HR has experienced in the last 15 years.

    • li10@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I haven’t worked with SAP directly, but did infra support for a company that used it.

      They were always having issues with it and the company they used for SAP support would routinely bill them obscene amounts even for simple tasks like updating file paths.

  • Sean Tilley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jira. In the Software-as-a-Service world, it’s often the tool of choice by Product teams to track issues, by breaking everything down into stories.

    It’s a horrible, slow, janky mess. The interface is confusing and poorly laid out, you can easily have too many options all over the place, and how its even used can vary dramatically from one company to another.

    Salesforce is also trash for very similar reasons. How Sales people around the world all vouched for this thing is beyond me.

    • throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Can confirm JIRA is an unusable mess. Submitting IT tickets was probably the worst thing about my last job. So much time wasted filling out irrelevant fields of information.

  • thenewred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Cisco Webex.

    You think teams or zoom are annoying? This is much worse. The worst part is with some default meeting settings, a loud chime would play every time someone joined. People kept this on for meetings of 300+ people, then they started talking over the beeps once “the popcorn slowed down.”

    • lwe@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      But have you tried Cisco Webex Teams? Or how we liked to call it “My first rails application.example.exe”.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also the default of not auto-muting everyone, then spending 25 minutes of the meeting asking people to mute when there was a button that would also mute everyone 🤦‍♂️

    • Im_Cool_I_Promise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      On Linux, the desktop client of Webex still does not support the chat feature, so you’re forced to use Firefox or whatever browser to join meetings instead. The best part is that some Webex rep said they’d add this feature to the client back on 2023, and it’s now 2024 and it’s STILL NOT HERE.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I didn’t leave the job, but I had my resignation letter written over this since I would have had to maintain it:

    My former boss had an absolute hard-on for “AI” and brought in this low-bid, fly-by-night “AI” software to automate all of our processes. I’m a fan of automation in general, but not this.

    This “solution” was basically a glorified macro generator that would screen scrape data from our apps and key into our other apps. Not only it was built on the absolute shakiest platform imaginable, but the documentation from the vendor outright told you to setup remote desktop services in a way that was in violation of licensing in order for it to work. The stack it ran on made a Rube Goldberg machine look like sleek, fine engineering.

    I repeatedly told him this was bad software, but he persisted to the point where we nearly went to production with it.

    The worst part? The applications he was screen-scraping were all internally-developed. We had access to the backend, frontend, everything. Rather than writing proper processes, he threw that piece of garbage at it.

    Luckily he retired before it went to production, and the new CTO shut it the fuck down.

    So, I didn’t quit my job over it, but I was looking and had my resignation letter written.

    • Braindead@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You know, in a lot of situations, when someone says “the worst part”, it’s not actually the worst part.

      When you use it, it really is the worst part, by far…

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Ha, indeed. To elaborate on that part:

        He made this demo he was so proud of. Watching it interactively, it was like 70 steps of “move mouse {X,Y}, click, copy, etc”. I could literally hear Yakkety Sax in my head as I watched it bumble through.

        After that, I went back to my office and wrote a 30 line Python script that accomplished the same thing, only sanely and with the ability to handle errors. He preferred his method since “it’s easier for our non-technical folks to automate their stuff this way”.

        That was the exact moment I started looking for a new job.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Non tech people should ALWAYS ask the support team when they need help automating IT stuff for precisely this reason.

        • tool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Before I replace it with something that won’t catastrophically collapse when the wind blows the wrong way, I get some sort of sick satisfaction out of doing autopsies on the house-built-of-matchsticks “solutions” that users come up with and I don’t know why. Some of them are truly fascinating and make you wonder how someone could possibly arrive at that conclusion based on what they were actually try to achieve.

          It’s also why if I’m asked to implement something, my first question isn’t “When does this need to be done?,” it’s “What exactly is the problem you’re trying to solve?”

          What a user asks for and what they actually need very rarely intersect.

          • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I wish I could hire you and a couple other people who replied to this lol. “Match stick architecture” is definitely something we have and I have been trying to shore up / replace for years.

            • tool@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sorry, I missed this comment. I actually love doing that kind of shit, I get some sort of weird pleasure out of fixing chaotic stuff like that. That tends to be my role almost all the time; I’ll come in, stay a few years, fix everything and get bored, and then move on somewhere else to do it again.

              My current job is the only place that I haven’t done that, because it’s probably the best company that I’ve ever worked for.

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m a camera operator. I work with different cameras on every movie set. The Sony cameras are known to have the worst menu system of all. It’s extremely dense, organized in a manner that makes no sense when on set (the frequently used options are buried in sub menus) and the navigation is painful with a crappy clicky roller. Even the sales rep for Sony openly apologized for the menus. This is unacceptable for a $52,000.00 camera. On the opposite side, there’s ARRI Alexa which has the simplest menu of all. Just a few pages of organized items with simple names. And a lot of common options accessible on the main screen.

    Edit:

    here’s the Sony Venice menu simulator

    And here is the ARRI Alexa menu simulator.

    The differences may not be apparent on the simulator but they become critical when on set with a time constraint.

    • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same but on the live side. Interestingly Sony has it down pat for their live cameras. The global standard for camera control is a Sony controller almost everyone supports them. Grass valley on the other hand hot garbage software, really good hardware.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes I do live as well the P1 menu is great and simple, but live cameras don’t need as much controls on the operators side as it’s mostly via CCU. The grassvalley are the worst, it’s kind of impressive how bad they are.

  • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I hate Teams, give me Slack

    Edit: I left an optional team in teams, and still got a notification for a meeting that isn’t on my calendar, my meetings page, nor do I have access to in any other way.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      IMO Teams beats all the others on video calling specifically. But everything else it does worse than its competition. The message boards and chat features are abysmal.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I beg to differ. I’m jumping over from a Zoom workplace to a Teams workplace, and Teams is trash. Worse video, worse audio, worse connectivity, fewer end user features, etc. The only thing that’s nice is how it archives meeting chats and recordings.

        It’s only used because it’s basically free with enterprise office.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        FOSDEM 2021 was hosted on Matrix. After that exp no other meetsing app lives up to it. I just want seemless chat with presentation and seemless break out rooms again.

    • TurtledUp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You must have a nice well maintained slack instance. We just migrated to it from teams and they’ve added me to 50 + channels some with thousands of people and the whole program churns. It doesn’t send timely notifications or sometimes none at all. If I leave any of the bogus channels I get automatically added back. Nobody wants to use it we all want teams back. The worst part is it only keeps DM history for two weeks our teams would keep history for years.

      • commandar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The last point is purely a configuration thing. Our Teams instance only keeps DMs for I think 30ish days – legal wants to minimize the surface area of discoverable material. Same reason our Exchange instance nukes emails over 12 months old unless you manually move them to an archive.

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Adding people back to channels is definitely an admin choice. 2 weeks history is a plan limit, I think only the free tier has it.

        You can mute channels / go @s only, create new channels for whatever needs you have. Hopefully you can find a way to make it more usable within the confines of your admins config. Also note, the config may not even be intentional, so it may be worth reaching out to IT

        • TurtledUp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m slowly starting to live with it and it’s getting better the more channels I mute and group. The notification issue is still real though I’ve adjusted quite a few settings to get it working better. Including disabling mobile notifications and making slack use it’s own notification system and not the system integrated one for Windows. The automation opportunities that exist are exciting too but will take us a while to flesh out.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hangul Word Processor. It had (has?) an updater that would pop up ads in the taskbar. Unfortunately the developer, Hancom, is so in-bed with the Korean government, it’s mandatory software in many Korean workplaces. Korean support has gotten much, much better in every other word processor, it’s hardly necessary anymore.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m a television technical director and Ross Overdrive is hell on wheels… it’s a video production system mostly used by local television stations to consolodate “automate” their control rooms down to one person. There’s three major companies that build systems like this: Sony, GrassValley, and Ross. In my experience GrassValley’s Ignite is pretty good, it’s stable and gets the job done. Sony’s ELC is best, going above and beyond what I need it to do (plus their customer service and tech people are just awesome). Hands down, Ross Overdrive is a pile of garbage. Their physical video switchers are really great (super intuitive and built to last), but the Overdrive automation system itself is just a clunky and uncooperative UI. I’ve had such a bad experience with their system I’ve turned down jobs when the place uses Ross Overdrive. Ross’s Xpression graphics system (or “Chyron”) is also a hot mess. I’ve heard that if you’re using all Ross stuff (video switchers, graphics system, video servers, robotics, etc) it runs smoothly and that may be true, but Christ-on-a-pogo-stick have I had nothing but trouble with their software.

    • kryllic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Just out of curiosity do you have any examples of quirks or annoyances that you found to be especially egregious? If you can’t share due to NDA no worries

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No NDA and no problem!

        When I last used Overdrive, it was a fresh installation, but the system itself had been around for a few years. The UI was uncooperative, making changes required going into a script instead of just a quick fix in the on-air playlist or changing a few lines of typed coding (like with ELC and Ignite respectively). The program itself was crazy unstable… look, crashes happen with any computer program or system, but this was a daily occurrence (sometimes twice in an hour long show) which is completely unacceptable. Finally, compared to Sony and GrassValley, building new codes was a trial that often required access to the video switcher itself instead of just handling things through the code editor program.

        While I haven’t worked on an Overdrive system in years, one or our competitor stations in town just got one; they’ve been having a hell of a time with it and it shows on-air. Been working in broadcasting for almost twenty years and I’ve launched all three automation systems at one time or another. With Grassvalley and Sony’s automation there’s seldom a problem at launch… Ross seems to always be a beast that needs to get wrangled. I seriously want to go to that competitor and help them (also, their studio is lit for shit and I want to fix that as well).

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What do you do when those crashes happen during a live broadcast? Is that something is viewers might notice at home?

    • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why ansible? It’s the best tool I know of for configuring systems when tyou can’t build a premade image. I’ve tried puppet and chef but really like not needing any agent on the target system despite the pain of YAML syntax.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Why ansible?

        Because it’s trash. It’s sad. It’s a slow, unreliable mishmash of suck that I loathe to work with.

        Not needing an agent?!? You write “caching shit so we can run our remediation in under a century and one pass” funny. I build new machines in 3-4 minutes with a full remediation and like 300 data points to check with the good tools. But it takes tower 3-4 min to net started before actually doing anything, and then another few minutes for ~30 datapoints. I do NOT want to see it with an actual payload.

        The only thing going for Ansible is the network effect of “everybody using it” and especially not learning well enough about anything else.

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Microsoft Windows. I used to be a sysadmin. New job is 100% Linux. Now I never touch Windows unless it’s to play a game.

    • Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Try steam on Linux. That shit just works now and I was able to fully ditch windows 6 months ago.