"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11.69Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.67Karrow-down1imageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.