• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is the majority of your country really better than its representation?

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      yes, take for example taxing the rich. majority of people want it, most politicians wont even touch the subject. at best they will lie about it and then not even try.

      there are many many other issues like this, just took the low hanging example.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I am not sure the majority of the country, if they were put in the same position of power, would not do the same.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because I think the majority of people are easy to corrupt, it takes exceptional people to resist the temptation of an easy life for you and your relatives.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              yes! thats exactly why i say rich people are to blame for most societal issues, and the model of democracy we currently have is very flawed. both of these things concentrate too much power.

              • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                yes! thats exactly why i say rich people are to blame for most societal issues

                But you agreed most people would do the same in their place, didn’t you? So it’s a general human issue rather than only rich people’s fault, isn’t it? Agreed that most democracies are flawed, but I still think social democracy is the best we have for now.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  not really. if we didnt allow people to get so rich in the first place, it would not be that much of a problem.

                  socialism has a better track record when it comes to this of course there are exceptions either way. a lot of the good stuff in socdem comes fron socialists anyway.

                  of course we dont have a 100% solution, just a possible step forward as it always is with humanity.

                  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Better track record to avoid rich people, but not to allow general population quality of life and prevention of an authoritarian government. I’ll take European social democracy and its rich people over it.