Given that the summary is written by the people who wrote the agreement, presumably under the advise of their lawyers, I think I’m going to trust it over someone’s assessment of what they happen to think a single out of context passage means (and to be clear, the entirety of this MOU - if you’re trying to do an actual close legal reading of it - is out of context because this exists in relationship with the existing contracts that it is updating).
Not trying to be an asshole here, but unless you’ve got access to a LOT more information about this than you’re letting on, I think you’re grossly overestimating your ability to tease out meaningful details from the text. “The people who wrote this are wrong about what it says and I’m right” is a lot to ask people to believe in a vacuum.
Given that the summary is written by the people who wrote the agreement, presumably under the advise of their lawyers, I think I’m going to trust it over someone’s assessment of what they happen to think a single out of context passage means (and to be clear, the entirety of this MOU - if you’re trying to do an actual close legal reading of it - is out of context because this exists in relationship with the existing contracts that it is updating).
Not trying to be an asshole here, but unless you’ve got access to a LOT more information about this than you’re letting on, I think you’re grossly overestimating your ability to tease out meaningful details from the text. “The people who wrote this are wrong about what it says and I’m right” is a lot to ask people to believe in a vacuum.