This is the reply:

As a model running through DuckDuckGo’s privacy layer, I can provide you with accurate information about their privacy features.

DuckDuckGo is a search engine that prioritizes user privacy. They have a strong commitment to protecting user data and have implemented various measures to ensure anonymity. Here are some key aspects of their privacy features:

  • No tracking: DuckDuckGo does not track users’ searches, browsing history, or any other personal information.
  • No personal data collection: They do not collect or store any personal data, including IP addresses, user agents, or other identifiable information.
  • Encrypted searches: Searches are encrypted, which means that even your ISP or network administrators cannot see what you’re searching for.
  • No targeted ads: DuckDuckGo does not display targeted ads, which reduces the risk of data collection and profiling.

Regarding cases where DuckDuckGo’s privacy was questioned, there have been a few instances:

  • 2011: DuckDuckGo was criticized for using Amazon Associates, which could potentially track user behavior. However, they quickly addressed the issue and removed the affiliate program.
  • 2019: A security researcher discovered a bug in DuckDuckGo’s browser extension that could potentially leak user data. The issue was promptly fixed, and an audit was conducted to ensure the security of their systems.
  • 2020: DuckDuckGo faced criticism for using Microsoft’s Bing API, which some argued could compromise user privacy. However, DuckDuckGo clarified that they do not share user data with Microsoft and that their partnership is limited to search results.

It’s essential to note that DuckDuckGo has consistently demonstrated a commitment to user privacy and has taken steps to address any concerns or issues that have arisen. They are transparent about their practices and have implemented robust measures to protect user data.

If you have any more questions or concerns about DuckDuckGo’s privacy features, feel free to ask!

Is anybody using duckduckgo over searx or other search engines? What is your experience?

  • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
    1·
    5 months ago

    DDG is fine, it works on vpns and Tor. No login required. It’s good enough.

    • NationProtons@sh.itjust.worksOP
      0·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, I used it for a long while in the past. Now mostly on searxNG, but I still like the bangs and quick results from ddg. Kagi is also pretty good, but feels a bit too pricey in my country.

      • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
        1·
        5 months ago

        searxng has bangs too

        !bang to search using a specific engine, !!bang to redirect to a search engine’s page

        • NationProtons@sh.itjust.worksOP
          1·
          5 months ago

          I didn’t know that, very useful. I suppose this is only for using other search engines like google, bing, etc… right?

          Or can it also search immediately on other websites like metacritic, rotten tomatoes by using bangs?

          • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
            2·
            5 months ago

            again, !bang is for searching using a specific search engine, !!bang is for redirecting to a search engine’s page

            !g will search with google

            !!g will redirect to google

            all ddg bangs are supported to my knowledge, but obviously !bang will only work with the search engines searxng supports

            • NationProtons@sh.itjust.worksOP
              1·
              5 months ago

              ok, so seems like I will have to use a double bang then. It does not seem match ddg bangs 1:1 though. And some don’t seem to be working correctly on my instance (E.g. !!mc for metacritic redirects to the wrong page)

      • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        I want to like kagi, but I value privacy, so logging in for searching is antithetical and just outside of my usage model.

        Maybe if they supported micro payments to give you like 10 minutes of searching, but I don’t see them doing that

        • NationProtons@sh.itjust.worksOP
          0·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, this makes it also quite a bit less interesting to me. Perhaps it would be better if they could use donations and have a free instance for everyone. But I suppose that earns much less, and having people host their own instances does not seem to be on the roadmap for them.

          • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
            0·
            5 months ago

            I did very briefly think it would be a cool project to set up a kagi reseller. A search proxy on tor, people send you micro payments in monero get a cookie set, and can use a few searches in kagi through the proxy.

            It’s all doable right now, but it depends on kagi honoring their API and pricing and not shutting such a service down.

            • NationProtons@sh.itjust.worksOP
              0·
              5 months ago

              That would’ve been kinda interesting.

              I think you can use kagi on as many of your own devices as you want right? I suppose you could share your account with multiple people (probably against their tos, I guess) and make it more private that way. Can’t really tell much with a bunch of searches from multiple people and you paying whomever is the owner of the account.