• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, lawns are wasteful.

    But there’s also water quality and flooding issues associated with using all available land for building.

    Grass and dirt absorb water. Rooftops and concrete don’t. 1-inch of rain on an acre of grass will be absorbed. Replace that grass with impervious cover and you’ve got an extra 27,000 gallons of water, or about 2 swimming pool’s worth of runoff.

  • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    These grass lawns always looks awful. 1 color, 0 personality and no variety.

    More plants are always better. Also even better plant a fucking tree.

  • deania@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I was about to say golf courses, but then I realized that people actually use golf courses to play golf, which is more then the average lawn is used for.

    • casmael@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hey that’s not true…. Lawns get used all the time for… err…… proving to neighbouring households that the Lawn Owner is rich enough to grow something useless there? Idk tbh