• Killing_Spark@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    but dressrules respectful of the institution can be demanded (e.g. not wearing headwear in church or covering ones hair when visiting a mosque)

    How is an abaya disrespectful to a school? If anything it’s one of the more appropriate kinds of clothing.

    France may have banned large crosses from their schools but it is not forbidden afaik to wear necklaces. I did not find an english source, here is a german one with my translation:

    In Frankreich herrscht Kopftuchverbot an Schulen

    Bereits 1994 trat ein Gesetz in Kraft, dass in Schulen nur noch diskrete - nicht aber auffällige - religiöse Symbole erlaubte. Zehn Jahre später wurden Kopftücher in Schulen vollständig verboten - Kippa und Kreuz nicht. 2010 folgte das Verbot der Vollverschleierung in der Öffentlichkeit.

    France bans headscarfs at schools

    In 1994 a law was passed that said that only discrete - but not prominent - religious symbols would be allowed. Ten years later headscarfs where banned from schools - while kippa and cross were not. 2010 the ban of the full body veil in public was passed.

    https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/frankreich-verbot-abaya-schulen-100.html

    Allowing kippas and crosses while disallowing a dress that is at most a religious gesture not even a concrete symbol is just weird.

    • sederx@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is an abaya disrespectful to a school?

      any kind of religion is disrespectful to any education facility since they teach exactly the opposite from one another.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sentence is so general that it has to be wrong.

        1. One could imagine a religion that bases it’s belief on the scientific method
        2. Education does not necessarily mean it’s all based on scientific facts

        But let’s assume you meant that “The currently most practiced religions are teaching something that is not aligned with the scientific method and facts we want to educate people on in the public education system”.

        Even then you are still saying just by being religious you are disrespecting the educational facility. But again let’s assume you only meant that showing that your belief in this religion is disrepectful.

        I’d argue that a school is still a public place, where minors are forced to be a big part of their waking day, where they should be free to express themselves. That may include challenging religious beliefs but also the teachings in the school, as long as it happens in a respectful way. Challenging ideas and disagreeing is not the same as disrespect.

        • sederx@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          One could imagine a religion that bases it’s belief on the scientific method

          it doesnt make any sense,religions are about dogmas not evidence. if they are based on science they are not a religion by definition.

          Education does not necessarily mean it’s all based on scientific facts

          ideally it all is. just because we are not smart enough doesnt mean we should entertain stuff that has even LESS validity, like religions.

          where they should be free to express themselves

          no child gives a flying bird about “expressing their religion” they are only religious because their parents are forcing them to. no other reason.

          so no the right of the parents to express their own religion through their unwilling kids doesnt trump anything about an education syste.

          • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            it doesnt make any sense,religions are about dogmas not evidence. if they are based on science they are not a religion by definition.

            Citing Wikipedia here:

            Religion is a range of social-cultural systems, including designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that generally relate humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements[1]—although there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion.[2][3] Different religions may or may not contain various elements ranging from the divine,[4] sacredness,[5] faith,[6] and a supernatural being or beings.[7]

            I’d say I could build a belief system around “designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations” that tries to understand the “supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements” by using scientific methods. Where “supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements” are just stuff we don’t yet understand like for example dark matter.

            Education does not necessarily mean it’s all based on scientific facts

            ideally it all is. just because we are not smart enough doesnt mean we should entertain stuff that has even LESS validity, like religions.

            Try teaching ethics based on only scientific facts then. Try teaching art and music based on scientific fact. Those are disciplines where opinions and feelings have a meaningful impact on the subject at hand.

            no child gives a flying bird about “expressing their religion” they are only religious because their parents are forcing them to. no other reason.

            so no the right of the parents to express their own religion through their unwilling kids doesnt trump anything about an education syste.

            You do understand that people in schools are not just 6 years old kids right? A big chunk of them are old enough to make decisions about themselves. Calling all of these individuals “unwilling kids” because they might be religious is very belittling.

            • sederx@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Calling all of these individuals “unwilling kids” because they might be religious is very belittling.

              none of those people sat down and said " i want to become a christian". speaking about this like its a choice is really messed up, children dont have a choice.

              • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I did not sit down to be raised an atheist and yet here I am, raised as one without having had a choice. Parents have the right to raise their children as they see fit, within some parameters of course. And I think that is a good thing, I wouldn’t want anyone to force me to raise my kids in a specific way. At a certain age teenagers are able to have their own thoughts though, and there are a lot of people that turn away from the beliefs of their parents. Others stay religious though and I think that is absolutely fine. I might not agree with a lot of what they believe in, but it also is just none of my business.

                • sederx@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  children being abused with brainwashing is absolutely your business even if you dont understand it.

                  just because you managed to escape it doesnt mean the average child is able to. look around, they clearly are not.

                  • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    children being abused with brainwashing is absolutely your business even if you dont understand it.

                    Being raised religiously is definitely not generally abuse, and I would say only a very small portion of it goes into abusive territory. Which, of course, yes should be everyones business.

                    just because you managed to escape it doesnt mean the average child is able to. look around, they clearly are not.

                    I did not escape anything, I am still an atheist. What I am saying is that it’s not inherently better to “escape” religion than to keep believing. I would even oppose that framing of religion being something you need to escape.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I regret this topic being made into a value weighting thing. I hate the hypocrisy in the current discussion. Although I also hate how signalling religosity somehow finds a way.

      My point is that the reason behind the policy is pretty solid. The state should be blind to my religion and no-one should get preferrential/or malign treatment because of it.

      Allowing kippas and crosses while disallowing a dress that is at most a religious gesture not even a concrete symbol is just weird

      Sure, all should be banned

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My point is that the reason behind the policy is pretty solid. The state should be blind to my religion and no-one should get preferrential/or malign treatment because of it.

        Definitly agreed!

        Sure, all should be banned

        I guess that’s where opinions just differ, and honestly my point of view isn’t really relevant here as I am not french and I have a very limited knowledge of their culture in this regard.