• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not really.

      I’m no basketball fan (not a sports fan at all), but imagine if this were permitted - you’d have a constant tussle under the basket, where all guys did was work on this technique.

      The rules change to address how players adapt.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just make the ball going up through the basket -1 point.

        And then let the other team throw the ball up through your basket to decrease your score. Now you have to defend your net as well as try to make shots on it.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Why would players practice a technique that involves passing the ball through a hoop not much larger than the ball itself twice for no point advantage when it is easier to dunk or take an easy layup?

        No one would be seriously “practicing” this technique. There are already “tussles” under the basket because it’s the highest-percent shots on the court, and there is a three-second violation in place specifically so bigs can’t camp out there.

        This is a rule because it was made a rule. If the rule was removed, it would have no recognizable impact on the game. But, for that same reason, there’s really no point in changing it.