hopesdead@startrek.website to Star Trek@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 months agoWho had it worse: Enterprise-D or Voyager?message-squaremessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up123arrow-down1message-squareWho had it worse: Enterprise-D or Voyager?hopesdead@startrek.website to Star Trek@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareharrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 months agoVoyager. They had Neelix.
minus-squareDaxtron2@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoI won’t stand for this antineelix sentiment
minus-squareharrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoThen you should probably sit down. It’s going to take a while.
minus-squaredata1701d (He/Him)@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoActually, I think Neelix doesn’t count as a natural disaster - I think he was a genetic experiment - a manmade disaster. I’ll admit though that after Kes, Neelix is a somewhat enjoyable character.
Voyager. They had Neelix.
I won’t stand for this antineelix sentiment
Then you should probably sit down. It’s going to take a while.
Actually, I think Neelix doesn’t count as a natural disaster - I think he was a genetic experiment - a manmade disaster.
I’ll admit though that after Kes, Neelix is a somewhat enjoyable character.