• loki_d20@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It omits why the U.S. vetoed it, which is that no one was willing to condemn Hamas or address how a cease fire would only encourage Hamas to carry out more attacks against Israel because they have shown no desire to end their attacks. No one has presented any support to find and stop Hamas attacks, only for Israel to end their attacks.

        So a cease fire would only last as long as the next Hamas attack.

        Edit: downvoted for sharing the U.S. side. Interesting. Anyone have a solution for stopping Hamas let alone actually condemning them in a movee to stop Israel’s attacks?

        • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          What you are saying is the US vetoed it because they accept the false dichotomy in the Israeli narrative of the situation.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          So a cease fire would only last as long as the next Hamas attack.

          Which we’ve literally observed several times before where Israel will sign a cease fire and hours later Hamas will attack… A ceasefire at this point is just signing up Israel for extra deaths and saves no one else.

          Edit: For you morons downvoting me. I suggest you actually do some searches on who ended each ceasefire on all previous signed ceasefires.