• Treatyoself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    I live around this mess and I have mixed feelings about congestion pricing. I am for a congestion pricing scheme but the revenue should be shared among all transit agencies that travel in and out of NYC. Who the hell wants to travel into the city when PATH trains only come every 15-20 off peak and weekend hours? Why not beef up transit routes FIRST, and then implement the pricing?

    The concept is a good idea. The execution is short sided and insular and I don’t see the MTA benefiting from any of this for at least a decade. That’s IF this money actually goes towards public transportation infrastructure.

    I see this going the way of the mandatory 911 fee we all pay and then having almost none of that money going towards 911 service.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you saying every 15 minutes is too infrequent for off peak? Because that seems pretty frequent to me.

      • Treatyoself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Apologies, I was incorrect. The typical off peak day time schedule spreads out to about 20-30 wait times between rides. I do believe this to be a huge problem. They used to be more frequent.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      We’re still paying the price for Robert Moses’s hatred of mass transit options. My personal opinion is that they should merge NY, NJ, and Connecticut systems

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This will create the demand that the market needs to act, it’s just how the system works. There is no incentive to spend money until there is demand there to take up the additional space.