Tried to give a good summary:
European politicians continuously restate that EU enlargement is necessary for geopolitical reasons. But they have not yet managed to bring European societies on board to support this view.
A plurality (37%, on average) of the citizens in the six countries surveyed by the ECFR believe that Ukraine should be able to join the EU – and this often includes people who are aware of the negative consequences of such an event. It seems that the emotional support for Ukrainians is still strong and outweighs rational considerations
There is no other way to underline the EU’s commitment to enlargement as a crucial geopolitical choice than to give clear commitments to Ukraine and other candidate countries.
At this week’s summit, it is imperative that leaders do not shy away from alarmist language and tough decisions.They should open negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, commit to necessary military support in 2024 and declare that the EU will prepare the next budget for enlargement.
The key measure of Ukraines victory, however, will not be the restoration of full control of its territory, but winning control of its future as a European, prosperous and democratic country. The EU is Ukraine’s only chance.
In the author’s opinion the EU shouldn’t shy away from future enlargement, especially as a signal to Putin and as a commitment to EU’S goals for continued peace and stability. It seems he’s advocating for a multi-speed Europe to crrate a passby for the problems with the much needed (Con) Federation reforms. Yet, these problems come forth via our democratic platforms and they manifest a (political) disagreement, of how this enlargement should take place. And yes, we mustn’t be bullied by malcontent speakers, who are usually being opportunistic. Imo, both agendas are relevant, and one cannot be without the other.-