It's been six months since I asked whether uv is the future of Python packaging: https://youtu.be/_FdjW47Au30With uv 0.3.0, the answer is in and I'll tell yo...
  • monogram@feddit.nlEnglish
    9·
    16 hours ago

    pipx, poetry, pipsi, fades, pae, pactivate, pyenv, virtualenv, pipenv

    Let’s hope this next one will be the true standard.

      • dallen@programming.dev
        4·
        13 hours ago

        I’ve been mostly a poetry guy but have tested out uv a bit lately. Two main advantages I see are being able to install Python (I relied on pyenv before) and it’s waaay faster at solving/installing dependencies.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          1·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, it certainly looks nice, but my problems are:

          • everything runs in a docker container locally, so I don’t think the caching is going to be a huge win
          • we have a half-dozen teams and a dozen repositories or so, across three time zones, so big changes require a fair amount of effort
          • we just got through porting to poetry to split into dependency groups, and going back to not having that is a tough sell

          So for me, it needs to at least have feature parity w/ poetry to seriously consider.