• Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    If a game has Denuvo, I will just not buy it. Ever. I won’t even consider it until it’s removed. Thankfully it doesn’t happen too often that games that interest me have it, but it does happen.

    Since this can’t be quantified, because there is no real way to get numbers on people that do this or similar things (except for “wild guessing”), three big ones (being public or backed by traditional investors) can’t make an argument for not having it. So here we are.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nothing like this can be quantified. There’s just people in these companies who think they have an easy target to pass the buck. Losers who lean on excuses like that never make anything good. It doesn’t even matter if your excuse is something real and valid. Just beat it.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This boycott is hard if you like Sega games, they are still paying for denuvo on their older titles like Judgement, multiple years of paying 100k USD a year, it’s insane.

      • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The only studio that I have to completely avoid because of this, who actually make games I’d normally play, is frontier developments. Think things like planet coaster, Jurassic world evolution or stranded: alien dawn. They also never remove it. I think I read a quote that whoever is in charge believes people will “get over it” and eventually buy it anyway. I can’t speak for others, but I sure won’t.

        It’s a shame, but there are other games in the genre(s) that are just as good, arguably better. And I already own more games than I can play, as the backlog seems to just grow.