• InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They would be good offensive weapons, except how do you back them up?

    They basically require China to pull a first attack, otherwise the USN backs out of theater and tries to draw China out of reach of their shore-based weapons.

    Meanwhile, all their land-based weapons on Taiwan, Japan, and SK are available, and somewhat harder to sink.

    If China has a good first strike, Ala pearl harbor, they have a really good chance to decide the war in their favor. If not, they’re basically standing there with their dick hanging out because their whole mainland has suddenly become a massive smorgasbord of targets.

    Don’t even waste weapons on their navy, or not many, you can do actual damage to critical infrastructure, while the most China can do is harass stuff in the region, maybe send a missile or two closer.

    This is why nobody wants to fight a war on their home ground, you can’t effectively defend your everything from missiles, they’re too versatile.

    • randombullet@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I also don’t think they’re willing to compromise their own shipping channels for the sake of taking Taiwan. I have a vested interest in Taiwan as half of my family lives there.

      I also believe that China has India to worry about as well. Not commonly discussed but still a valid threat.