• driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Pretty good. Nazism is ilegal in Brazil, and promoting it is too. Get fucked Nazi hosting platforms, you wouldn’t be missed.

  • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Rumble, the video-sharing platform where Russell Brand has 1.4 million followers, may not be a household name but it has grown in popularity – especially among those from the right and “alt-right” – as a place said to be “immune to cancel culture”.

    Rumble is backed by the billionaire and prominent conservative venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who invested in 2021, and the conservative former Fox News presenter Dan Bongino, who has 2.9 million subscribers himself. The platform is valued at more than $2bn (£1.6bn).

    Alongside Brand, who regularly posts conspiracy theories and critiques of mainstream media, is Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, who was an early adopter of the app, and Andrew Tate, known for his misogynistic views. Tate has 1.6 million followers. Trump joined Rumble after he was blocked by other platforms, and now has 2 million followers, while his son Donald Jr this year announced an exclusive partnership with the platform, where he will host a biweekly livestream show called Triggered with Don Jr. The platform is also used by Alex Jones, a conspiracy theorist, who has defended Brand and was last year ordered to pay £1.2bn in damages to families of the Sandy Hook school shooting after falsely claiming the attack was a hoax.

    Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University, said: “The specific gap that Rumble fills has been a growth business fuelled by Covid vaccine conspiracies and misinformation. It is no coincidence that the big growth in the user base came between 2020 and 2021.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    For further info, so other posters know what’s going on:

    Currently the Brazilian civil code has a gap that allows you to promote Nazism as long as you don’t use the swastika, nor “practice, induce or incite discrimination or prejudice based on race, [skin] colour, ethnicity, religion or national [SIC] origin”; refer to law 7716/1989 of the Civil Code article 20*.

    And then there’s “that fucking guy” who says that there should be a Nazi party in Brazil; he’s called Bruno Auib, also known as Monark, some random podcaster. He did not violate the law in letter, but clearly did it in spirit. And later on the same guy went saying “the elections were rigged!” and something like this, so the Brazilian judiciary (Alexandre de Moraes) used the opportunity to demand social media platforms to get rid of his accounts, under the allegation of fake news*.

    And now Rumble is all over the place trying to justify the non-removal of that guy. The platform is Canadian and the decision is from the Brazilian judiciary, and yet they’re babbling about “muh Amurrcan values” and that “gavurrnmenrs urr bullying uz”.

    [I like the outcome of the judiciary decision. The way that it was done was a bit shitty, but better than nothing.]

    *the links are in Portuguese but I can translate relevant excerpts if anyone so desires.

    • 𝔇𝔦𝔬@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      TEALDEER: It wasn’t against the law, it was just, “Wrong think”

      If even that. I don’t know the bloke or what he says, but nowadays, it doesn’t take much imagination for what is considered, ‘scary and offencive’ I also do not think an entirely different country can demand another one to obey its laws.

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        230 WORDS IS TOO LONG FOR AN ILLITERATE LIKE ME: It wasn’t against the law, it was just, “Wrong think”

        I’m not surprised that you’re a failure to distinguish between “this is not against the law” and “this abuses a loophole of the law”.

        but nowadays, it doesn’t take much ASSOOOMPTION for what is considered, ‘scary and offencive’ [SIC - offensive]

        What he said is mentioned in the very comment that you’re replying to.

        I also do not think

        Wow, this is news for… nobody.

        I also do not think an entirely different country can demand another one to obey its laws.

        Brazil is not demanding Canada to obey Brazilian laws. Brazil is demanding Rumble to obey Brazilian laws if conducting businesses in Brazil, or cease operations in Brazil. Rumble did the later, as per news in the OP (that you likely didn’t read either).

        The internet and online services make this specially messy but it’s the basic gist of it.

        [NB: I don’t expect the above to be able to parse a single sentence, I’m answering his shitpost for the sake of other users.]