• SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    However, Cummins’ statement also indicates the settlement does not meaningfully impact its business prospects. The company says it “is in a strong financial position with existing liquidity and access to capital to satisfy obligations associated with the settlements, support ongoing operations, and execute its growth strategy.” In other words, the fine might hurt its bottom line, but in the end it’ll roll right off. It’s sometimes said that crimes punishable by fines are only crimes for the poor. Without evidence that Cummins’ business has been truly harmed as a consequence of its actions here, it’s hard to read things any other way.

    Yay.

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Cummins says it “has seen no evidence that anyone acted in bad faith and does not admit wrongdoing.””
    So either you are evil or obnoxiously stupid, but it’s probably both - hence the deranged idea of a car.

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Last I’d heard, the EPA was still calculating these emissions on a per gallon of fuel basis instead of the only one that makes sense, per mile, ignoring the fact a gallon of diesel is capable of carrying a vehicle further, producing fewer emissions overall. They’re also directly responsible for making US cars getting larger and larger thanks to poorly written rules that essentially penalize smaller vehicles.

      So either the EPA is evil or just obnoxiously stupid at this point.

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Recently, research from an international team spanning six nations argued that new diesel cars emit less pollution than gasoline cars. The study was published in the journal Scientific Reports. Diesel is a much cleaner fuel than it was previously, and modern diesel engines are much better equipped with filtration systems to prevent excessive pollution. The European Union promoted diesel as a more environmentally friendly fuel choice in response to the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. While diesel contains more CO2 than gasoline, diesel cars tend to emit less CO2 over the course of their lifetimes.

        Particulates? Diesel engines also emit fine particulate matter in their exhausts. As well as causing problems for respiratory systems, this kind of pollution has also been shown to lead to heart problems. Regulations requiring diesel particle filters (DPFs) resulted in significantly reduced pollution from diesel engines.

        NOx, is cleared up in a three-way catalytic converter in gasoline engines, which emit about 30% less NOx, than diesel cars. However, since NOx exposure is known to cause respiratory problems, modern diesel cars are fitted with filters that prevent excessive NOx, from reaching the atmosphere.

        Newer diesel cars are designed to meet modern emissions standards, and when using the correct filters they produce the same or even fewer emissions than gasoline. However, older diesel cars and trucks are significantly more polluting than gasoline, when considering public health, clean air, and built-up urban driving conditions.

        VW Dieselgate again , yet they want to reduce the power of the EPA etc

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    If real full-ownership existed in and all purchased products came with source code, this would never happen and everyone would’ve better off. Ownership of property is an unalienable human right; exploitation is a crime.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not the buyer’s fault. You’re going to repo, as in forcibly reposess, consumer vehicles purchased in good faith from a dealer?

      Cummins needs to recall and fix them all.

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is exactly the kind of thing you’d expect from dodge ram owners or sellers too unfortunately.

    I really hope here in Australia they require a truck licence soon (as there are serious discussions about it currently)