• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

    This is one of the rare occasions I’m siding with Google. The news outlets are claiming that they should be paid money for those result snippets. It’s not because I’m caring for Google so much but because that stance hurts small search engines.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      EU: You have to pay to show our news.

      Google: Ok. We won’t show your news.

      EU: Pikachu face

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s what basically happened in Germany like 10, 15 years ago when the first publisher had that idea. Its news stories would still show up in search results but only the headline, not that text snippet and no thumbnail image. These results were less attractive to users, so traffic from Google to those web sites crashed down by like 80, 90 percent.

        In the end the publishers gave Google a free license to reproduce text snippets and thumbnails. The tightened copyright law provision wasn’t repealed. Small search engines without leverage still (AFAIK to this day) have to pay.

        So Google pays nothing, publishers earn nothing, upstart search engines can’t afford the fees, and so Google leaves even more in power because of a law not even they wanted.

    • Lennny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not wanting to appear on Google is how we’re going to get EVEN more dailymail type shit.