pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 6 months agoTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square289fedilinkarrow-up1549arrow-down1110cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgtil@lemmy.world
arrow-up1439arrow-down1external-linkTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgpbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square289fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgtil@lemmy.world
minus-squaretherealjcdenton@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down14·edit-26 months agoThere are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
minus-squareUnmapped@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·6 months agoAnarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
minus-squarechobeat@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 months agoCommenting with no clue what people are talking about
minus-squareCowbee@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 months agoAnarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
There are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
Anarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
Commenting with no clue what people are talking about
Anarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.