![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fc47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
4·
1 year agoIt honestly was less bad than i expected. Not saying it’s perfect but it could have been a lot worse.
It honestly was less bad than i expected. Not saying it’s perfect but it could have been a lot worse.
Could start by removing subsidies.
Easiest way to reduce the environmental impact is to do more factory farming. Though I don’t really think that’s a good idea since it’s often kinda horrific.
It all really depends on your individual situation. It’s impossible to make blanket statements like that since all food types have their pros and cons, it’s more a matter of eating a varied mix of generally healthy things and not just eat only one type of food.
Yeah afaik there are a couple of suitable places for more hydropower but no plans for more due to, like you said, local environmental reasons.
That said, sweden is basically already completely “decarbonized” (if anything can really be decarbonized), we only have a reserve oil powerplant that runs for maybe a couple of days each year (~9 days last year, though last year was especially bad). Sweden also generally has a pretty big net surplus (usually about 10-20% of production) of green power that is sold to the european grid.