![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fslrpnk.net%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fd7afefc0-bd61-4280-9e65-8a1b8fcdd708.webp)
![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fc47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Just to clarify, the one that said that is actually one of the oldest far right parties in the country, not one of those that just popped up.
Just to clarify, the one that said that is actually one of the oldest far right parties in the country, not one of those that just popped up.
What exactly is the utility of the above quote of yours then?
To show that the correlation is spurious at best.
Has it become even more successful after he’s mellowed out?
Yes, it has. Usage of Linux has been growing over the years.
My point is exactly that. It’s not obvious, and as such you can’t attribute the success of Linux to his behaviour. Like the OP said, there’s no logic in looking at something successful and picking a singular thing to be responsible.
How is that obvious? Especially because it’s become even more successful after he’s mellowed out?
But did it work because of the style or in spite of it? No reason to believe it wouldn’t be even more successful if he had been less abrasive like he is now.
Well, in that case, nobody cares about what you want to say, either.
The fourth power equation you’re talking about is weight per axle. A semi truck will weigh much more in total. But the difference in weight per axle isn’t as high as you seem to think.
socialist prime minister
That’s a bit of a stretch, he may be Socialist Party, but most of the policies of his government have been practically neoliberal.
A reminder (that really shouldn’t be needed) that collective punishment is a war crime.
Probably pretty good on a barbecue, from all the fat.
What’s going on?
Rayon’s a different material, not carbon fibre.
Renewables are a means to an end, not the main objective. That’s CO2 reduction. To that end, the relevant data is average carbon intensity. So I’d say this is a more relevant graph: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity?time=latest®ion=Europe
The biggest chunk of our yearly consumption is still gas. And France’s carbon intensity is much lower than ours still (one of the lowest in Europe), so any energy we’re importing from them is actually lowering our CO2 average.
Take it from the fossil fuel subsidies.
Sure, but it’s still thousands. From Cambridge dictionary:
the thousands
numbers between 1,000 and 1,000,000
1200 is thousands. 1.2 thousands, to be specific.
Who are you talking to? That was my first comment here.
Ah yes, what could go wrong with doing things the way they were done in the past?
While I agree, it didn’t come into play in this instance.