God forbid! Don’t you dare say that! We need everything, but especially what we haven’t bought yet and ridiculously overpriced branded shit! /s

So the obvious truth is starting to get shouted in the streets: the muslim communities dream about a caliphate in Europe. It will get messy for our kids.

LE: typo

Why split them up?

"Rockets are still being fired from Gaza into Israel, and we condemn this,” he adds.

Now, It’s true, they can’t. Before they attacked Israel I believe they could.

The link is not working anymore, but reading the headline: as a father I would take my kids and get the fuck out of there! I can understand the motivation and fight for whatever rights, lands, religion but knowingly involving kids is unacceptable.

“Your son killed so many Jews,” he said. “Mum, your son is a hero.”

😂😂😂

Removed by mod

😂

Name calling. And all of the sudden you’re right! But hey, you forgot “bigot” from your answer, we all know you’re not truly right until you call me a bigot!

Unfortunately, you don’t understand the basics of living in a society. Please stop being arrogant and don’t assume you have an opinion worth listening to.

Hey, you cannot say that here! It doesn’t fit the general narrative. What are you thinking? /s

Thank you for your reply. It’s simple:

• if they have Australian citizenship (I think in 67 was a push for this) then they already have all the Constitutional rights and obligations like every other Australian citizen. Why are these extra steps necessary?

• if they don’t: what is their current legal status? Why not just give them citizenship and thus having the right of representation in the Parliament and so forth?

Ok, thank you for your patience.

But aren’t Aboriginal people citizens of Australia and so already part of the Constitution thus having legal rights like everyone else? What are the extra rights and representation needed?

New to the subject here: why is it a desirable thing to recognise Aboriginal people in the Constitution?

As I read through the article in the Aboriginal camp not everyone wants this. So I’m puzzled.

Ok, then maybe I’m at fault and I didn’t understand what you were trying to say.

Ohhhh, we’re discussing hypotheticals, sorry I thought you were serious.

Because then for sure you would have taken in consideration that religious affiliation, nationality and branding are pretty different things. The level of psychological involvement and the way these elements interact and define ones individual structure is quite incomparable. Usually for religious people (especially fundamenlists) religion does define their personal values, morality an so on. This IS the purpose of religion after all.

And then of course you would have taken in consideration that this is a conflict with mainly a religious conflict. Although you can say palestinians fight mainly for their land the other Muslim countries that support them have also religious motives.

And of course it’s a fact that they didn’t choose to take another religious affiliation or as you say a different brand.

But they don’t, so you argument is invalid.

Ok, good luck.