![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fslrpnk.net%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F00be6193-b3ab-400b-9374-f640eb98cedf.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
So far fine in FreeTube, touch wood.
So far fine in FreeTube, touch wood.
Cheers.
I’ve had MeGusta at top weight for quite a while (years I think), should probably try ELiTE, wonder what the bitrate diff is…
Interesting, do you have an automated workflow for this?
You’re welcome to your opinion ;)
Fair cop on the inconveniences, although I’ve found it fine after an adaption phase, coming from fedora it was lesser than hopping to a new distro. Hard agree on knowing the nuances being problematic, clarity and accessible education is sorely missing, certainly the steepest part of the learning curve.
I just run ‘distrobox upgrade -all’ in my Daily.service, didn’t need quadlets (although after adaption I quite like them for containers now).
Why would I use a system that isn’t supposed to change if I want to change it?
There’s a bunch of benefits, atomic updates, intrinsic rollback, security of immutability, safe automatic updating and it goes on. Some things are not quite ready yet, e.g. things like sddm which should probably install themes to /etc (which they’re working on), so as often happens in linux, workarounds ensue. Making one directory mutable does not destroy all the benefits.
Yeah, I had that at the beginning, then added to my fstab
#enable sddm and therefore good themes
/var/sddm /usr/share/sddm none rbind 0 0
and KDE themes with sddm components install fine now (most themes install fine into /home, does Gnome really not have per user themes?)
Essentially you can tactically make things mutable as needed, use sparingly, but maybe not even trying lessens your opinion, no?
Yeah, I had that at the beginning, then added to my fstab
# enable sddm and therefore good themes
/var/sddm /usr/share/sddm none rbind 0 0
and then it works, kludgy, but sddm is apparently working on allowing themes in /etc, sometime soon.
Inconvenient package management
Fair.
If there’s a flatpak, no problem.
Once you realize you do package management in distroboxes rather than the main OS (rpm-ostree etc), no problem, plus you have the AUR at your disposal.
So Ima go not fair, although there is something of an education gap atm.
K, seethe mildly with justification, but enjoy it :)
‘Cause I’ve got faith of the heart
I’m going where my heart will take me
I’ve got faith to believe
I can do anything
I’ve got strength of the soul
An’ no one’s gonna bend or break me
I can reach any star
I’ve got faith
I’ve got faith
Faith of the heart
Also, ewww…
Free warning, seeth not, be happy you know…
You’re not wrong. But generally the idiocy is in response to beserkeness elsewhere, madness follows…
Be aware that halfway decent backup solutions dedupe. Which is not to say you shouldn’t clean your shit up. I vote https://github.com/qarmin/czkawka.
To a large degree, the point of RAID is to not care about drive reliability, trust the process. Also, you seem to conflate RAID with backup (“RAID is not a backup”), you want both. In a NAS, you’re probably better off with RAID5 + backup.
In a system that can take a drive failure, the current datahoarder zeitgeist is Manufacturer Recertified (Enterprise) Drives, see ServerPartDeals.com if you’re a yank, other countries have their own options.
Nope, As long as you’re not as uncreative as to use Correct Horse Battery Staple.
93, good trot. As a non US person, strangely Experiment IV by Kate Bush (Wilhelm Reich song) started playing, if it is synchronicity,I’m happy. Pass well baseball icon.
I’d suggest you move toward a backup approach (“RAID is not a backup”) first. Assuming you have 2x10Tb, get a 3rd and copy half of your files to it, disconnect it, and now half your files are protected. Save, get another, copy the other half, now all your files are protected. If you’re trying to do RAID on USB, don’t, you are already done, otherwise (using SATA or better) you can proceed to build your array in an orderly fashion.
Rather obvious that ‘What product did live up to its advertised claims?’ is a more useful question…