The words you’ve suggested are more objectionable than the word you’re objecting to.

If you want to claim a position of supremacy and justice in linguistic expression, you should educate yourself on the words you’re choosing to use.

I’m not asserting that the word bitch is more objectionable than any other ‘curse’ word.

You’re claiming that.

Your ignorance is astounding.

That didn’t last, lol. He has said he was ready to go for another debate in the last day or so.

It’s that I’ve been in schools with after school activities in the last year.

Kids were popping chip bags and nobody drew weapons or jumped because of a loud pop that sounds nothing like a normal gunshot.

I was in school before columbine ever happened.

I don’t think violence in is ok in most situations. I think America has a mental health and gun issue.

I like the Capri Sun mylar things from a nostalgic perspective.

I was responding to you Coggy.

There were drills where you were taught what to do in the event of a life threatening emergency.

There were talks about nuclear events and preparation for scary things.

There were school shootings before columbine.

People didn’t have national and international news poured into their faces as easily before.

I mocked the confidently incorrect assumptions of American school history and celebration of personally enforced ignorance.

I’m not sure how I missed that from their first post. /s

I get it, you’re scared. Noone was ever scared like that before.

Edit: I looked it up, mocked a false statement and declaration of ignorance.

Got downvoted. I’m not promoting violence, I’m mocking ignorance.

And - Rudolf Wild invented the drink in 1969

Columbine was far from the first school shooting. According to the Washington Post:

“The first recorded school shooting in the United States was in 1853 at a schoolhouse in Louisville, Kentucky. On November 2, 1853, Matt Ward shot and killed teacher William H.G. Butler with a pistol hidden in his coat pocket.”

Pro tip: block 2 trolls that can’t see past their nose to have rational discussion in the thread.

You can replace the OS on most Android devices.

Specifically- devices made by Google have been unlocked allowing replacement of the software.

You still have to put together a working kernel and drivers, environment, etc.

Not much stopping folks from doing that though.

GrapheneOS, Ubuntu, and others have made headway for some devices.

Each device potentially uses different hardware implementation and features.

Or, maybe writing firmware and code that doesn’t make money is the opposite of profit.

Where is the incentive to write code that reduces security and costs money they won’t recover ?

This is a crowdstrike issue specifically related to the falcon sensor. Happens to affect only windows hosts.

Right on. Thanks for that. Appreciate you responding.

The lazy part was your statement being at odds with your source, while discounting other folk’s experience or skin.

I know of more than one person who has experienced sunburn from closed windowed (newer)vehicle rides in full sunlight.

Yes. The answer is yes, glass doesn’t prevent sunburns.

It will delay them.

Article states, accurately; “you can still get burned with long enough exposure”.

Your link disagrees with you. Hoping nobody pays attention? Hoping for up votes?

False fact post, bad faith actor, or llm. All 3?

From your link: “You can still get burned with long enough exposure.”

Not to be pedantic, commercial systems do go through lock replacements if they are budgeting properly.

A guest wouldn’t notice unless they were watching maintenance teams replacing lock internal components.

How about when there are folks who have been harmed by people with agendas?

They’d prefer their code or commentary to be inclusive, not exclusive?

All of this ignores this is not happening in a vacuum. Project 2025, trump, the supreme court selection of limited precedent and ignorance of other precedent…

This is a brick in the pavement of our descent into fascism. Hand waving it away as a wonderful clarification that enabled prosecution of the office is unreasonable.

They already ruled the Constitution and clear discussion in Congress during the original Amendment, invalid when the insurrection clause and States rights were revoked… Colorado ballot decision ftr.

They’ve shown their hand. They’re willing to select evidence, much like your review, that fits the narrative - ignoring any other facts.

It’s already being used to delay adjudication in clear abuses of power.

Law requires a certification from a board to practice. You’re of the opinion that examination that proves ones understanding of the law(bar exam, exhaustive study followed by proving that knowledge)— puts you on equal footing with that majority?

I continue to firmly dissent your assertion regarding the validity of your opinion, you have firmly claimed not to be a bar certified individual.

Being an expert in law here has weight. A majority of them feel this is a power grab. You’re welcome to hold opinions. Spouting endless review to make responses difficult isn’t helping you.

This is akin to you saying you know better how to file legal paperwork or act as a defense attorney because you read about it.

Do you also dospense medical advice?