Yes!! I said it wrong ^_’

What do you call a fish with no eyes? A fsh

What do you call a fly with no legs? A walk

What do you call a deer with no eyes? No idea

What do you call a deer with no eyes and no legs? Still no idea

“Large percentage”. Please state and citate.

(Tbh, 1% would be a large percentage of a group voting away their own rights)

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice…!

Good for them for coming around.

Unless the one time was this one, most recent, time

How do you upvote one thousand times with just one account?

Thank you, kind stranger

Cause funding the military is 50% of our taxes 🤸🤼‍♀️🤹‍♂️

This! I love my sweet boy and he’s so gentle and kind 99% of the time. But sometimes he choses violence. He is the reason I think all people who keep big cats as pets are not logical.

https://archive.ph/WsWpa

Yes, exactly. If those silly poor people only worked harder they too could be aristocracy.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-for-ethical-whistleblowers-new-start

He made 45k. I hope this gofundme is real bc it’s almost at 200k

I think there’s a difference in average maturity between US teenagers and European teenagers. I moved to the states when I was 20 and was shocked about how childish some of my new peers seemed. And I remember also being completely surprised I couldn’t even lift my dad’s case of beer into his trunk (he’s a wheelchair user). The cashier flipped out when I picked it up.

€2k uni fees? I paid that per semester, at a community college…where my husband is a professor and I got a 75% discount…and I’m in state (because for some reason that makes a difference)

No, but is says: “if buying isn’t owning then piracy isn’t stealing.”

I would love to get a mask made that read “I have tuberculosis”.

Beautiful and peaceful

Wish I’d read this before I commented, you’re a lot more succinct. Agreed, you know where you are with a bear, humans have a high enough percentage of crazy to be a risk.

I don’t agree that this kind of article is useful overall, but I propose rewriting the question a little bit to understand the response better:

“Humans, would you rather be stuck in the woods with a strange human that was most likely physically bigger and stronger than you or with a strange bear that was most likely physically stronger than you?”

The original question plays with subconscious bias and fears a little too much relating to men, and doesn’t address the true nature of humans in general.

If the question was instead:

“Humans, would you rather be stuck in the woods with a strange human or a strange bear”

My answer would still be a bear. I believe I could take care of myself for a few days and don’t want some other person there that I have to discussions with, compromise with, help survive or be scared of. Humans are too fucking random.

Anarcho Syndicalist Commune

you lucky lucky bastard