Yeah, but a third isn’t necessary.
“Look, Lord,” they replied, “we have two swords among us.”
“That’s enough,” he said.
— Luke 22:38 (NLT)
Yeah, but a third isn’t necessary.
“Look, Lord,” they replied, “we have two swords among us.”
“That’s enough,” he said.
— Luke 22:38 (NLT)
You ever think about how weird it is that RPG means two different genres of game depending on whether it’s a video game?
If you want to make cool things, you play Minecraft. If you want to do cool things, you play Terraria. In Minecraft, it’s all about gathering resources and building, and the combat is an obstacle on the way to that. In Terraria, it’s about combat, and you gather resources and reshape the world to help you fight bosses.
The terms are that you have to insert your license agreement text? Man.
The dog is polite enough to stop chewing so you can force their mouth open, but doesn’t grasp the concept of dropping it on their own.
Do you… do you yawn when you think too hard?
Quick googling shows that in 2021, agriculture produced 10.9 billion tons of emissions, while fossil fuels produced 36.8. There might be some overlap between the two, but I’m assuming not for ease of math.
The way I see it, doing both would be nice, but if we try that, fossil fuel companies and bacon enjoyers are going to end up on the same team, and that’s going to be very difficult to fight. The corporations can easily push propaganda like “Fight this legislation, they want you to eat bugs and tofu instead of real meat for your Fourth of July barbecue,” and then nothing gets done.
On the other hand, if we target fossil fuels first, we may be able to cut 77%, and by doing so we overcome the “it’s too late, there’s nothing we can do about it” mindset, and no longer have fossil fuel industries trying to fight us when we target agriculture next. Plus, getting people to drop meat keeps getting easier as meat alternatives get better.
We’ve got to strategize. Targeting both at once may be the only way we can hit the target, but it’s so much less likely. I’d rather stop emissions after missing the target than fail to stop them at all.
I’d rather switch the datacenters to green energy before trying to convince people to give up cheeseburgers.
Something I learned fairly early in German class.
Du
Du hast
Du hast es
Du hast es gemacht
If you want a more accurate translation/explanation of the lyircs: Hast and hasst are homophones. Hast means have and hasst means hate. At the start, it sounds like it’s “du hasst mich” (you hate me,) because the alternative doesn’t make sense. But then when gefragt is added, the past tense of ask, it becomes “you have asked me.”
“Und ich hab nichts gesagt” means “and I said nothing.” Nein should be translated to no, but otherwise it’s pretty much just wedding vows. That translation is not literal, but that’s to be expected for songs.
Personally, I care more about the volume of ice cream I eat than the mass. I don’t want to pay more for more calories when diminishing marginal utility is already in effect.
Or whatever people think is the most powerful, at least. It’s worth noting that the meta can often be wrong, and if you play what you enjoy, you might find yourself discovering something stronger.
But that doesn’t mean everything goes in the memes community. For example, uploading a mere T-shirt would be met with primarily downvotes.
Always cut extra?
I’m just saying that the benefits of autism, such as they are, cannot be achieved by an NT brain.
Yeah they can. I don’t know how the likeliness compares, but it’s well within the realm of possibility.
“I am trash.”
Boring.
Self deprecating.
“I am trash incarnate.”
Intriguing.
Sounds kinda epic.
Self deprecating.
Sleep is for the weak.
However, without sleep, you become sleepy, and sleepiness is weakness.
Therefore, sleep is for the sleepy.
Okay, but outside the context, this is good advice.