lol…

Short answer? Yes. Long answer? Absolutely.

Isn’t that the place where fElons go?

Those kids should be forced to hear her name every morning they wake up for the rest of their lives.

That’s a good idea! However, I do most of my… lemmying? On an iPhone. It’s not too easy to use the web interfaces for editing on iOS.

Astute!

I’m pretty sure these publications would if it weren’t for the fact that conservatives are litigious little snowflakes. So much so, that I’d be surprised if they didn’t have the word “defamation” on retainer.

Conservative commentators criticized the portrayal as outdated and offensive, calling it an unfair caricature of Trump voters.

Apparently this passes for “melts down”?

It takes two. He was staying within the wheelhouse of the discussion. You chose to make it personal. If you don’t like what he has to say on the subject, either respectfully disagree, or don’t respond.

But you antagonized. That doesn’t warrant banning someone because they stood up for themselves.

This ends right now.

I’m done discussing this with you.

No, he hasn’t. And I’m don’t arguing with you about it. What he is doing is reckless and dangerous. And your support of him is disgusting.

[ANECDOTAL]

[ANECDOTAL]

Because there is no counter-point to your RFK bullshit. It’s like arguing with bible salesmen.

Again, you have proven that you have no experience in psychology, or pharmacology, so stop with the RFK rhetoric.

You’re not qualified to disagree with science and people with PhDs. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Both are worse than the other.

You’re one hundred percent correct aside from:

the Ukraine.

You have no place diagnosing people with no proven experience in the field of psychiatry, or pharmacology.

So stop parroting RFK talking points.

Omfg…. 😂 Now THAT is clever!