No, Fedora is semi-rolling with less random freezes. Regular Ubuntu is similar but just not Ubuntu please.
Fedora also had 13 months of support so staying on the older version gives an extra stability.
And then there is OpenSUSE slowroll, which is CI/CD with more testing
Fedora Atomic has no liveUSB
Lol was für Lappen
Ich hasse die Tagesschau so sehr.
So ein Haufen Bummser
Yes I think you mentioned the relevant points here. Ubuntu tests their preinstalled software, while there is tons more in the repos that is not as tested. Same with Mint.
And they backport only stuff they think is necessary. For example Plasma 5 is based on the EOL Qt5 and backporting things to Plasma 5 is nearly impossible as you need real Plasma devs and nobody really wants to do that.
Plasma 6 is really stable, 6.1 not so much, but the timing was not perfect. Simply because they do their release schedule as fixed as that.
It is a total pain if you simply want working software, as they may backport some stuff, but all the stuff not preinstalled, or that is very complex, will not get fixes.
This is the same with all stable distros, if the maintainers dont literally maintain all the software there is.
And way more reliability, even though it is pretty modified.
It is randomly frozen as not all developers follow Ubuntus release schedule. They just release when it is ready.
Stability means backporting tons of bugfixes to tons of small packages and libraries. I dont think Ubuntu does that for enough packages, best example Plasma 5.27 on Kubuntu. I have reported over 200 bugs I guess and most of the newer ones are just fixed in Plasma 6.
Flatpak for sure is a good way, and if a distro is stable, they should only install Flatpaks.
Plasma 6?
Gut ja. Aber es gibt halt keine Autos mit GrapheneOS etc. Stattdessen sind die dann alle verwanzt und senden alles nach Hause.
Digitalisierung ja, aber dann investiert bitte das selbe Geld wie vorher in freie Software und Hardware.
Stable is not equivalent to “works well”. It is randomly frozen at some point, mostly not in contact with upstream devs, so you just have outdated packages.
OpenSUSE slowroll sounds like a way better model. Or maybe CentOS stream.
Du kannst einfach das share limit setzen zb auf 5, dann teilt man nicht viiel mehr als nötig
Ich hab meinen bei ner share quote von 5 ausgestellt.
Bis ich die Sachen so weit verteilt hab, bleiben sie auf der Platte!
Und das ohne Port forwarding, man kann immer noch teilen aber die Leute müssen ihren Port offen haben.
Thanks for the info
Yep and hope their servers dont have equally bad code.
Plasma 6?
Interesting on what distro and when did you try that?
I didnt know that it relied on XWayland but that seems outdated anyways
Very nice, thanks for the links.
Where do the sandboxing profiles come from? I suppose from the aisap repo?
He says Windscribe sucks. Mullvad obviously not as they are regularly audited
It is semi-rolling. They ship different point releases and kernels within a release