• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle















  • I’m not sure. Every time I think about it, I come to a different conclusion.
    For example for the animation industry, today is way faster to create an animation than 100 years ago and there is needed many less people to create a work than in the past, but this didn’t lead to a decrease in the number of people working in the industry, but rather in an massive increase in the output, So if before there were a few pieces of animation created every year, today there are a multitude more, you can see for example the Japanese animation industry the astounding number of new stuff being released every year.

    What I mean is, in the current system, if you can make more with less, this does not lead to working less, but just in producing more, because companies have to continuously increasing profits forever. The working less won’t come simply in automating more, but the system itself will have to change


  • No, I’m just saying people have to work and if just a small proportion of the population is at work age, then that work age range will inevitable increase. Or do you think just 10%-20% of people working will be be able to support and supply the remaining 80% - 90%?

    We can also solve this by throwing old people(when people who today are 20-40 get old probably)to the pit like that dinosaur show from the 90s ;)



  • Calavera@lemm.eetome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s so funny how OP and people like him took the bait from the big capitalists and now are complaining about old dudes that never had any power instead of the ones that had and have real power.

    They have no clue that in the future they are the ones who will have fingers pointed at