

Who said she killed him?
Who said she killed him?
The VA doesn’t find out what’s wrong with vets, they ask vets to come with deep medical knowledge and diagnoses to support their claims. In my branch at least… diagnoses weren’t handed out. Only Motrin.
As you say, these companies give vets the ammo needed to support their claims, and that requires a medical provider’s time. Whoever is behind these articles is advocating against veterans receiving benefits once the military breaks them.
All they had to do (as an example) is tell someone, somewhere, that only one form of ID is enough to let him back into the country—if he happens to show up there—to be compliant.
Anything along these lines is “following the court order” to facilitate his return.
The SC was complicit when they chose the word “facilitate” instead of giving measurable tasks.
make (an action or process) easy or easier.
That’s so fucking little a requirement, it’s effectively not one. How no one saw this I don’t know.
Either that or it was being harassed by UAVs, which could have been the actual target of the AA.
I still use matrix when I want to do complicated searches. Google bought it years ago and incorporated its feeds into google flights. Try the advanced options: https://matrix.itasoftware.com/search
“Good people on both sides.”
This headline is making my head hurt.
urged authorities to arrest those funding such actions
Says the asshole trying to buy an election to rig a court ruling?
So… middle school?
Hmm. The lines are why it doesn’t matter.
There is obviously an easy fix for this. Get rid of the NSA, CISA, and other cybersecurity people.
Another look: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gbFU6KoEASU
This might be what gets me to finally purchase VR
Now? This has been true for about a decade; since he was activated 9-10 years ago. It just hasn’t always been as blatant.
I’m sure Trump wouldn’t insta-pardon everyone arrested.
But what is Vance’s position on this presumed disrespect? If Vance thinks it’s okay, then I’m sure it was all just a big mistake.
It’s a principled take. There are plenty of articles showing it’s Trump’s base that’s receiving a significant portion of injury from his orders and policies. Unless they feel the pain — without democratic intervention to cast blame — these people will never change their minds. They may not in any event, but it has to affect them. It’s either these hard lessons, or we keep spiraling to civil war.
Learn from history.
The privileged voters tried to save trump’s base from itself, but what do they know:
https://www.ft.com/content/6de668c7-64e9-4196-b2c5-9ceca966fe3f
The results also show poorer and less-educated voters now think Republicans best represent them — a reversal from 12 years ago, when Democrat Barack Obama was president. After a deep-dive into the data, here are five takeaways. Democratic support depends on high-income voters Economic realignment has been under way for some time, but hastened in this election. The Democratic party now appears to be the party of high-income voters, not those with low incomes.
Or… now hear me out… we let America get exactly what it voted for. Democrats can’t keep bailing out the republicans.
The question at hand is stupidity. I’m not sure why you invented different problems to discuss.
This type of discourse is pretty common around here though…
“Mom…. “Moom”…. “Moooom!”