Another look: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gbFU6KoEASU

This might be what gets me to finally purchase VR

Now? This has been true for about a decade; since he was activated 9-10 years ago. It just hasn’t always been as blatant.

I’m sure Trump wouldn’t insta-pardon everyone arrested.

But what is Vance’s position on this presumed disrespect? If Vance thinks it’s okay, then I’m sure it was all just a big mistake.

It’s a principled take. There are plenty of articles showing it’s Trump’s base that’s receiving a significant portion of injury from his orders and policies. Unless they feel the pain — without democratic intervention to cast blame — these people will never change their minds. They may not in any event, but it has to affect them. It’s either these hard lessons, or we keep spiraling to civil war.

Learn from history.

The privileged voters tried to save trump’s base from itself, but what do they know:

https://www.ft.com/content/6de668c7-64e9-4196-b2c5-9ceca966fe3f

The results also show poorer and less-educated voters now think Republicans best represent them — a reversal from 12 years ago, when Democrat Barack Obama was president. After a deep-dive into the data, here are five takeaways. Democratic support depends on high-income voters Economic realignment has been under way for some time, but hastened in this election. The Democratic party now appears to be the party of high-income voters, not those with low incomes.

Or… now hear me out… we let America get exactly what it voted for. Democrats can’t keep bailing out the republicans.

The question at hand is stupidity. I’m not sure why you invented different problems to discuss.

This type of discourse is pretty common around here though…

Most

Are you sure?

In any event, its probably a game of tug of war, and the decisions we make as a society depend greatly on how society’s parents were raised.

The key in that phrase is “offended”. You see, right-wing parents get offended when brown people are welcomed.

I do the problem solving, then let the AI write about it for me.

Literally

No it doesn’t, or the republican votes would have gone down too. Lol, I was very clear that all of the loss was on the democratic side. Your theory doesn’t hold up.

Hahahahaha

Such wonderful arguments you present. I’m glad you believe you add so much to this discussion you need to brigade your own fake votes.

It’s Government efficiency, not overall efficiency. The Government is most efficient when it doesn’t exist at all.

This is their plan, it’s right in the name. Otherwise the ‘E’ would be for “Effectiveness”.

This is what right-wingers are after globally. Once you break the government, unions and worker protections, this is what’s possible.

Lol, I say one thing and you answer another. Just like you did with the original post. THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION IS THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, NOT FEDERAL ELECTIONS AS A WHOLE.

If I say it slower, will that help you understand? Quit changing the fucking topic to try and make your point. And as I pointed out, please let me know when you find evidence 8.2M people tried to vote but couldn’t.

1st, gerrymandering has nothing to do with the presidential election. It was obvious from your post you know very little about US elections.

Next, there were 8.2 million fewer votes in 2024 than 2020. All of that loss was on the democratic side. Do you have evidence literally millions of voters were disenfranchised?

Had those missing voters participated in good faith in 2024, Trump would not be president today.

Are you trying to pass an amendment? They actually had a supermajority for 72 days. Not that they didn’t get anything done, mind you, but the point stands.

Obama had a majority too. The problem is too many members rowing in different directions within the party.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress

You just need ocular implants!