Keep talking with your psychiatrist.
I created a space for people to make connections and learn from each other. I call it Grok.Town and plan to start up a Lemmy instance at that domain, but for now it’s a space on Matrix with a few rooms to chat and get to know one another. Check it out @ https://matrix.to/#/#groktown:matrix.org
Keep talking with your psychiatrist.
Seems like it’s pretty much like any other surface in your kitchen, it requires regular cleaning.
As I understand it, some studies don’t distinguish low-volume drinking from not drinking.
The quoted portion of the meta-study in the post makes it clear that the studies reviewed did distinguish between low-volume drinking and not drinking.
It wouldn’t surprise me if sample selection not taking into account social factors which would cause people who drink at low volumes to lie and say they don’t drink could play a role in certain studies.
Two organizations that are trying to make a difference:
The Journal of Trial and Error.
[The journal’s editor-in-chief was interviewed by Nature.]
SURE: Series of Unsurprising Results in Economics
I found out about these today by the comments linked below:
Citation count has been and continues to be the defacto measure of research importance.
There was a whole season of The Wire that was dedicated to the theme of news publications demanding that more be done with less as budgets were cut. Craigslist was a major factor in the trend as it cut revenue severely for local publications.
That’s an interesting observation, it’d be interesting to see what could be the reason why that pattern might hold in a proper survey. But it could just be chance that it was that way at that particular facility.