He literally is an old man. Which is the core issue.

Trump wouldn’t have agreed if the mods were going to been anything but prompt readers

The Dems are reactionaries and that is a terrible best option.

There is a inversion of sorts here that is also important. If some people have access to the information hidden to everyone else they have power and control. Allowing just a few to read everything everyone else does gives them undo power. The access law enforcement has can and it abused, it is also sold or stolen.

I’m saying that if you need signals to reduce the risk of crashing you shouldn’t drive, which is probably 98% of humans. That is the vast majority of people should drive.

You know the answer, why can’t you admit it?

Keep up the cope, you shouldn’t be driving.

I’m sorry that you’re not good at driving but please stop using cars and putting others at risk.

By majority it’s 100%, physics exists and the time required to maneuver in being capable of turning or lane changing is plenty to clearly signal what it will do. The reality is that if you need turn signals you are bad at driving and should not drive. Most humans are not capable and cars should not be how the majority of people get around.

It’s really funny to watch people cope with the reality that they are not skilled at using a car. People should not drive cars, cars killed tens of thousands of people.

Yeah it’s really not hard to read what a car is going to do. It’s clear that many people cannot do it and to that end should not be driving.

If you need other cars to use turn signals you shouldn’t be driving.

Yes, the supreme Court gave itself that power. To that end the other branches could justifiably choose to not find that to be valid.

By Jan 2025 the only outcomes are Trump has won without conflict or the election is a contested mess and congress is deadlocked on certification and they will have moved to the vote by state in the house. In which case trump will be elected.

The Constitution doesn’t empower the court to interpret the constitution. If the executive chose to ignore the court it would be perfectly legal.

I actually ment corporate ha

It’s highlighting a potential significant risk. Major ozone loss is much worse than lack of internet. The high uncertainty of the paper is easily offset by the harm that would be caused if the paper is correct.

Just a cooperate lawyer, so yes.

Whats funny is the poster here was very likely part of said disinformation campaign. This is an attempt to distract from the moral wrong excuted here with the cover of legality. No laws existed that made the Holocaust illegal yet the post laws and trails are valid and necessary. The acts here should be seen as a form of biological warfare, a crime against humanity with all the reprehensible disgust and reasonable punishment due to those who did not stand up and walk away.

Following orders is not just how it works and the criminality of following illegal orders has been established many times.

This is a crime, regardless of the laws today, regardless of my feelings, it is never acceptable to attempt to infect others with a deadly biological agent directly or indirectly.

It is in part based on my feels.