Interesting idea to put wireless devices under the screen, but I don’t think it would be easy to implement. There would be a lot of interference with screen circuits. Also no phone usage while charging. I think it’s better if they stay on the back.
ji59
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 16th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Wireless charging and contactless payments are the main reason manufactures switched from metal covers to glass.
The only reasons people use glass are scratch resistance and because plastic “feels cheap”. I also hate this transition to glass and am glad my Fairphone doesn’t have one.
1·6 months agodeleted by creator
16·10 months agoNever heard of RISC-V?
And Ireland, and Island, and Norway.
Color is determined by value, not country
Wow, blame the user for manufacturing decisions. Give me an example of alternative with quality camera, wireless charging, water resistance, …
I laughed at Apple (BTW Samsung too) for the aweful cutoff at the top of the screen, for the lack of headphone jack, SD card reader. Now it’s impossible to find powerful phone with these things. So please don’t blame users for stupid corporate decisions.
Also broken glass back compromises water resistance and could be safety hazard if the shards fall of.