Ja, habe ich auch gar nicht so verstanden. Die Wettbewerbssemantik war, eigentlich sinnloserweise, behelfskonstruktion um allen differenzierte Kudos zu geben

Achja stimmt. Ja ok die hat gewonnen bzgl. heroisch Faktor. Alan Magee, der nach Flaktreffer 2 mal bewusstlos geworden und dann in den HBF von St Nazaire gekracht ist, gewinnt m.E. Faktor funny (und - Name)

Ja aber die war doch noch in dem Flugzeug innen drinne drin

Juhu zusammen Ü

Geil

Kann nochmal jemand für Teilzeit-Zuhausis zusammenfassen was pasiert? Also ich latsch gerne mal hinterher aber Was der vorher/ nachher Unterschied dieser Pilgerung?

Was is das was machts das is das besser als hier?

Clickbait light weil er schon fallschirm hatte und der jetzt nicht komplett versagt hat Aber kein stress alle sofort wieder beruhigen hier gehts zu epic free fall comp:

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Eugene_Magee

I get the epic of marking climate change as a general human issue by doing stonehenge. Doing, let’s say, the wall street bulls statue or smth in London marking climate change as a capital issue would have been smarter thou

Oh god please no, please don’t escalate this war by adding the killer kind of weapons to it

If you seek emancipation of anyone or anything by critique, you should read up what others wrote down, that had or have the same goal.

Otherwise your are individualistically and egoistically sabotaging the very project you want to contribute to.

Saying the most edgy thing to feel yourself “being on the right side” will not do good to anyone except yourself.

“Lass mal weißes Pferd nehmen das passt irgendwie gut”

Immerhin haben sie dich nicht weggeschmissen

Mach einfach den Gesichtspunkt

…und wie stehts um den Organisierungswillen?

Du weißt, seit es mehr als an/aus zu entscheiden gibt punktpunktpunkt

Ach, zwecklos der Versuch diese Nachricht vielschichtig wirken zu lassen. Bleibt ein einfacher Appell: Macht was aus eurer Empörung, werdet aktiv!

Dass es keine wirkmächtige Antwort von links auf die sozialen Fragen und Widersprüche der Gegenwart gibt, ist ja warum die Rechte aufsteigt.

Diese Antwort zu geben, sprich: Die dafür notwendige Stärke solidarischer Bewegungen aufzubauen ist Antifaschismus. Rache und Hölle undsoweiter sind sehr nachvollziehbare Reflexe, aber nicht der historische real deal

I understand and totally support that in general. I’m gonna try to explain my point of view.

In this case we don’t exactly look at policy-making. Between stating that a majority supports governmental action to ban one use plastics and actual policy is a process.

This process will “forge” the outcome. In it, several conflicting interests will meet/clash and according to the power relations between them, they will be able to enforce their respective will.

Since the power relations are, let’s say, fucked up, we are constantly seeing how profit of few overrule need of many and overall rational solutions.

Thats why the criterion “clearness” seems out of place for me at this point. Certanly, before it comes to the actual policy-making, things like the washabillity of surgical equipment will be processed. You will certanly not end up with a dirty scalpel in your body.

That’s why the scepticism of your initial comment seemed odd to me.

Don’t know if this should be seen as a given standard, or if we (“average lemmy users”) should disclaim it more often, but I don’t mean to be offensive (even though this format of short message discourse provoces a certain sass). I mean to have meaningful conversation about each others POV’s. That’s somewhat the point of lemmy, imo.

The magic about collective action is that the everyday-normal-coorperation of humans comes up with solutions for everyone. The pointer to individual decision-making in lack of collective action thus doesn’t work as a measure of how serious people are.

Also seen in episodes like

“Oh, you are wearing shoes made under unfair conditions?!”

And

“Oh there is fossil fuel in your energy consumption?”

Or

“Oh if you like democracy so much, why do you exist in a not-so-democratic-country?”

Regarding how rushed international policy-making for the environment and against profitability is not at all a problem has never been and won’t be anytime soone, that “scepticism” seems to be the product of “looking for superiority” here, imho

1. Tiniest fraction of single use plastic
2. Could be recycled or reused/resterilized
3. What flavour of skepticism are you trying to perform rn?