I’ve never had a rolling black out or brown out but we burn coal around here and there are proposals for some small nuclear sites. Yes there’s some solar and wind as well but we are a net exporter of energy to the western states.
I’ve never had a rolling black out or brown out but we burn coal around here and there are proposals for some small nuclear sites. Yes there’s some solar and wind as well but we are a net exporter of energy to the western states.
HOA doesn’t allow energy generation.
Yeah exactly. None of it is profitable if you can’t meet instant demand changes at any time of day. Build the nukes to meet full demand needs and supplement them with “more profitable” options for redundancy.
No one. Just the hypothetical. “I blew up your house because you are a nazi/fascist/commie!” Even if that’s a lie it doesn’t fix your house.
Oh yeah, and it’s just propaganda. If your home is being bombed and country being invaded does it matter the motive? not really.
Give me a 80 year old cabinet maker to teach me how to build cabinets, but the people who think nuclear energy is unsafe also believe hiding under their desk at school would protect them from nuclear war. Older doesn’t mean wiser on everything.
The older ones are stupid and afraid of nuclear. No one should listen to them.
Yeah I know. And in the end the reason doesn’t matter, like at all.
Wars have been started for far less. Not like there’s a world court that’s going to rule if a claim is valid or not.
In U.S. domestic politics, for example, an informal offer can constitute a binding agreement provided one party gives up something of value in consideration of payment in goods or services. A similar principle applies to inter- national politics: not only are formal agreements often the codiacation of arrangements that states would make regardless of a formal offer, but if private and unwritten discussions are meaningless, then diplomacy itself would be an unnecessary and fruitless exercise.
Nope. The article then goes on to describe his research into exactly how NATO discussed how there was a long history of informal agreements during the cold war. The Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved informally for example.
Read past the first line.
no, but technically yes! Not like Russia needs to justify anything based on truth if that’s what they decide to do anyway though.
Yes they did. Stop believing Social media trash propaganda you support.
Technically he’s correct about the right, NATO agreed not to expand east back in the day and then violated that. I haven’t seen the evidence that they could bury everyone though.
holy crap a voice of reason, hopefully they listen. And hopefully she’s free to come scream at the climate activists here in the US too.
Oh I’m sure there’s some sort of contract and pay. Work place violence related crimes maybe, unpaid hours? paying below minimum wages? I couldn’t tell if the one woman was claiming he raped her, or she was a previous victim of rape being abused again. But if he raped her too that would be the big charge.
Fantastic news! so many people are so afraid of the word “nuclear”, and don’t understand how large of a volume the ocean is. the lethal dose of Fentanyl is like the size of a grain of rice. Put all of the known legal and illegal volume of fentanyl into the ocean and it would be undetectable.