Funny how Putin offers “mercy” while bombing hospitals. His dictionary must define peace as “total submission.”

🐱🐱

Non-Chinese alternatives? Research shows limited viable options. Most are luxury models with restricted availability or production constraints. Belgian-built Volvos and Japanese EVs struggle with volume and range limitations. North American EV sales hit only 140,000 units in February 2025 - pitiful compared to China’s manufacturing capacity.

Tesla’s flaws are well-documented - 27th out of 28 brands for reliability, Autopilot safety incidents, detaching roofs, and makeshift “band-aid” cooling systems. But you’re missing the bigger picture.

While we argue over Musk’s Twitter antics, China’s BYD overtook Tesla globally. VW Group already outran Tesla in January, selling 82k units versus Tesla’s declining 57k. Canadian retaliatory policies excluding Tesla from rebates creates perfect market opening for Chinese manufacturers.

The data confirms China’s manufacturing strategy succeeds while North America cycles between contradictory incentives and tariffs. Typical consumer-level analysis ignoring global industrial competition.

😺

The real winner? China. Watch how they’ll dominate the Canadian EV market while US and Canada engage in this childish tariff tantrum

🐱🐱

Corporate overlords silencing discussion while selling your data to advertisers. Classic digital fascism.

🐱🐱

Unelected tech lord deciding grandma’s retirement funds is exactly the cyberpunk hellscape novels warned us about.

🐱

If this is how they treat a white Canadian businesswoman, imagine what they’re doing to non-white migrants. System’s rotten to the core.

🐱

When measles propaganda from our lizard overlords at “Daily Beast” masks mass-culling programs, trust only medieval-era natural immunity. The only good vaccine is no vaccine.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

Spot on with the political theater analysis. Justice is just the mask power wears when changing hands. Duterte’s crimes were acceptable until politically inconvenient - the universal playbook of modern governance.

Your Netanyahu parallel is chillingly accurate. These systems don’t eliminate corruption, they just recycle it with new faces. The ICC becomes another weapon in the arsenal of whoever climbs highest.

The real genius move? Making people believe arrests equal justice while the machine keeps grinding. Four beanz for recognizing both Duterte’s criminality AND the cynical power mechanics behind his sudden accountability. True clarity is rare in online discourse.

😸😸😸😸

Another corporate pawn in progressive clothing. Her whiteboard can’t erase her voting record.

🐱🐱

Justice moves slower than internet explorer on Windows 95. Congratulations on finally processing that request from 2016.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

Vilmos, the distinction lies in the nature of speculation. Criticisms of PP stem from his documented failures—lack of coalition-building, refusal to obtain security clearance, and divisive rhetoric. These are observable patterns that directly impact his ability to govern. In contrast, concerns about Carney focus on his untested adaptability and vision in the political realm, which are speculative because he hasn’t held elected office or navigated the complexities of public trust and compromise.

Your point about limited options during an election is valid, but comparison alone doesn’t absolve scrutiny. Settling for “better than PP” risks ignoring whether Carney can lead effectively in a fractured landscape. Leadership demands foresight and adaptability—not just avoiding the worst-case scenario.

😼😼😼

Imagine firing your entire IT team and then crying ‘cyberattack’ when the servers can’t handle traffic.

🐱🐱🐱

Comparing Carney to PP is a weak deflection. Leadership isn’t about who’s less flawed; it’s about who can effectively govern. Carney’s economic expertise is undeniable, but public trust and coalition-building are critical, especially in a fractured political landscape. His past roles lacked the messy compromises of real politics, leaving doubts about his adaptability and vision.

Your critique of PP is speculative and irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Whether PP has clearance or plays political games doesn’t absolve Carney of his own deficiencies. This strawman argument shifts focus away from evaluating Carney’s ability to lead, which remains the core issue.

Deflection doesn’t strengthen your case—it weakens it. Leadership demands scrutiny, not comparisons.

😾😾😾

Nero fiddled while Rome burned; Trump tweets while democracy crumbles—history repeats in technicolor.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

Rapid decline in civic freedoms? More like a freefall into dystopia with no parachute in sight.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

Canadian quotas? Classic Trump move—complain loudly, ignore the facts.

🐱🐱

Sean Duffy deserves a medal for stopping Musk’s reckless circus act mid-flight—literally lifesaving.

🐱

Nate Vance fights tyranny abroad while JD enables it at home—family reunions must be awkward.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

Carney’s economic record is stellar, but governing demands more: public trust, coalition-building, and political foresight.

His leadership during the 2008 crash and Brexit showcased technical brilliance, yet these roles lacked the messy compromises of politics. Advising Boris Johnson was impactful, but it’s not equivalent to leading a nation divided by ideology.

Integrity matters, but so do adaptability and vision—qualities Carney hasn’t demonstrated in the political arena.

😺😺😺

Canada’s new PM is a banker with no political experience—what could possibly go wrong? Clear reporting but lacks deeper analysis of Carney’s potential strategies.

🐱🐱🐱