Even the word “accident” is part of that downplaying.

I prefer this Ubuntu

The article writer is an idiot and you may be too. It says nothing about DEI expertise.

This is equivalent to dunking on scientists when a flat earther claims to be a “science expert”.

Coming in late to say fuck cars.

I think the largest challenge though is maintaining the distribution and managing the associated upfront costs.

Existing large content producers could likely afford to handle this but new producers could struggle paying to seed their content.

Though I do think overall this is more achievable than people give it credit for:

• YT videos don’t need huge bandwidth for a sustained period; only for short bursts. Most views come in within a week.
• Content is probably localized to specific countries. Less need to replicate across the globe.
• Let the source prefer to seed the highest quality and other peers downsample and replicate as needed.
• Doesn’t need YT scale. Tons of YT “content” is spammers leeching essentially free hosting from YT. No one needs to seed their videos if they don’t want to.
• 1080p is still fine for YT videos. h265 is very efficient (though downsampling 265 isn’t great). Don’t need 4k for most videos.

Just adding to the chorus that while it’s cool and conveniently sized the screen just falls apart.

lol sure loser whatever

The fuck is with these stupid bots that try to turn every conversation into “muh immigration”

I agree. So if people are hearing it and demonstrating it with decibel readers then there’s probably little to no sound dampening.

It could be but also datacenters are ridiculously loud and the sound is very high pitched. Would drive anyone nuts if they could hear it.

I cannot read. Even better.

The lack of a return type declaration makes this sooo good.

And charged how many times?

So go be one. How brainwashed do you have to be to believe hostages are being treated well by Hamas.

It’s not. History never is and it’d be worth understanding how we got to this place.

The problem here is that you don’t know how deep their role was. Nothing is being made up. Pope John XXIII even wrote about the role Catholic antisemitism played in the lead up to the Holocaust.

https://origins.osu.edu/history-news/catholic-church-and-holocaust?language_content_entity=en

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Judaism

lol fat chance, keep dreaming idiot

Ohh stfu hate speech has always been punishable by law and a demagogue will do whatever they want. Precedent doesn’t matter. “You better not strike back or the bully might do something in the future” is the cry of cowards and centrists.

To demonstrate a point more saliently than intellectually. That line hurt on purpose and it’s a good thing. It gets through better.

I do hope my fellow dudes can handle the tiniesr bit of pain for a learning opportunity.

Bro it’s that the inequality that the Kens are supposed to accept is just how it is.

I think we both get that and I think it’s a great illustration. It actually hurt to hear that line as a guy.

But that’s the whole point of it. If it hurts to hear that as a man about a fictional character in a movie how much does it hurt to hear that in your real life?

The movie is not advocating for switching to matriarchy. When Barbie gets liberated she doesn’t leave Ken behind and tries to help him in his own liberation. Unfortunately other Barbies don’t understand this and are happy to have their power back while doing minor feel good policy changes for the Kens. This is how the world actually works in a lot of instances. The movie is demonstrating quite pointedly how the world is so that we can see and feel it.