yea precisely. Sound design is less about how it really sounds, but more about how you think it should sound + some flair to make it a show.

Fun fact! sometimes in movies when there’s a big fire sound designers will put animal roars into the fire sounds to add an extra layer of fear you don’t even realise your body is going to react to

I think this is more of a defence against scammers honestly, with a convincing enough scam you could make valve belive an account holder was dead and you’re a family member wanting to transfer their account to yours.

Hell, I saw my dead friend’s account message me in Russian, contacted support about it, and all they could do was remove the hacker’s access, not even lock or delete that account.

And how could they? Unless you have your full name, address, and other identifying information somewhere on your account (strongly ill-advised, obviously) Valve can’t cross check it with a death certificate and take action, for all they know you could be cooperating with the hacker or submitting fake information to “prank” your friend by getting their account removed.

Allowing account transfers would open a whole new can of worms.

Just write down the password and login if you know you’re going to go. I don’t think Valve under Gabe would have issues with that. Though I do worry for its future

I don’t know where I read it but the best defence to “if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear” is “I don’t have anything to hide but I don’t trust your judgment or intentions”

the sound design of the real world is rather boring and often unappealing. Sound designers on movies are gods of those audiotary universes, they will paint it however they want

then don’t go spinning in a city, pick a village or a small town and go wild, it’ll take them a while to notice and a longer while yet to bother stopping you, and chances are (with village police) they’d first sit down and watch for an hour or so. Adding it all up I’d say you’re looking at at least 8h of spinning. In the end you’ll just be told to stop since it’s 100% legal or you could pioneer a new law in Poland! exciting

in Poland there is no legal limit, so if you fancy spinning around come visit!

bang on the doors of the AI customer support until you get to a human and they’ll do it for you! taking the power of being able to cancel normally away from you is by design. Legally they have to give you some way out, but only if you 1) pay them more (default option) 2) demand they do it through their support channels

fuck adobe

miraculous survival? world’s first talking head? depends on the exact wording and if you got your intro from a benevolent fairy or a genie

coma would be the universe being nice to you. Imagine a full body paralysis where you’re aware of every second passing and the only thing you can do is rot, and maybe hope twitter’s head clown puts a dodgy chip in your brain so maybe you could feel the joy of playing solitaire again.

I think just the fact that the answer could be something like: “2 more years, suicide” is a no-go for me. I’m not a suicidal person so hearing something like this would absolutely fucking terrify me. I think the more time I’d have left the more freaked out I’d get, constantly wonder when will it start? When will the hell that pushes me to take my own life begin?

oh just because you know when you’ll die doesn’t mean you can go yolo on everything. Getting into a horrific accident and becoming bed ridden for the rest of your life doesn’t count as dying. Imagine laying in bed, body paralysed, knowing that this is the place you’ll spend 30 years in.

You’d still be need to be as careful as usual, just with a painful awareness of how many seconds you have left until the end, and with a curse of not being able to go on your own terms if something terrible happens.

I think it boils down to a fear of rejection.

Our entire lives we watch pretty people on TV being pretty, that’s the most influential standard for “pretty” we have, and still sometimes the script calls for one of them to be labelled as “ugly” and to be ridiculed or rejected from the “cool ones” because of it. Think of all those beautiful acresses cast as nerdy characters who’s hair was put into a ponytail, who got given glasses and a singular fake pimple (of even) and everyone pretended like they were some epitome of unattractiveness

obviously TV didn’t make this problem, but it sure as hell made it worse.

you don’t want to be ugly, because the ugly ones don’t fit in, the ugly ones don’t eat with us, the ugly ones are poor and smelly, so you don’t want to be seen as ugly, do you?

and even if tomorrow cometh thine coin shan’t ever be as powerful as today

I once again urge you to use the critical thinking you’ve grown so fond of because no.

For all we know exactly one person and one god actually cared about Narcissus’s not reciprocating their affection - Echo, and Nemesis, and Nemesis only cared because Echo wanted revenge and well, that’s Nemesis’s thing after all.

(edit: oh and once again, referring to the wording of the curse, if Narcissus was asexual the curse would not even be a curse for him. The predisposition of said curse is falling in love, if he was ace/aro then that wouldn’t even apply)

Do not claim one intepretation to be above all else. “Can only be read” - it can be read as anything the reader reads it as. It can be read as Nemesis being a piece of shit or maybe bored, it can be read as Echo being a misguided victim and that rejection being the last straw for her, it can be read as Narcissus having a severe intellectual disability, it took him several paragraphs to realise the person in the water was his own reflection after all. It can be read as anything.

The only thing that matters is the value we attribute to a specific reading. And although the “Narcissus is asexual” take is an interesting perspective it’s incredibly foolish to think people will know that such reading even exists, let alone instinctively understand what you mean, it’s just not wildly taught and obscure to the point where when I first attempted to google it the only things I found were broken links. In fact when you first said that asexuality is narcissism I thought you were acephobic, and you implying that asexual people are selfish, it wouldn’t even be the first time I saw that argument.

then I urge you to think critically a little bit more and realise that one reading of an ancient story is not the divine truth of what the story means or tries to convey.

In my reply to the blog’s perspective I outlined several different reasons why Narcissus might’ve not responded to the affection of others. Why are you insistent on him being asexual being the only “correct” interpretation of the story? Are you being ableist by saying that he’s not autistic?

Arguing that a story only has one correct reading is not critical thinking, it’s foolish at best.

👁👄👁 you good?

1. they probably don’t know about a random person’s blog where they read a world famous story in a different way than others

2. what? “why they don’t accept the right of asexuals to not be in a relationship” what are you on about??

from the article

Narcissus was cursed with being enraptured by his own reflection as a punishment by Nemesis, and Nemesis agreed to punish Narcissus because he didn’t date anyone.

The words of the curse, though slightly different throughout various translations, only say, in essence, “when he falls in love may his love not be returned”, none of the translations I’ve seen imply he’s being cursed to fall in love with his reflection. And surely if he was asexual/aromantic the curse would mean fuck all to him right?

This entire interpretation depends on the words of the curse making him fall in love with his reflection, and I have not seen a version where that is what happens. Perhaps original Greek would be enlightening but I don’t speak that.

Yes the story isn’t the epitome of queer representation seeing as it assumes, at least in my mind, that being an ace is not an option and you’re curse-worthy if you don’t want to fuck people - but then again his sexuality is not brought up in the story at all. He was a 16 year old boy who’s only description we got is “really pretty and likes hunting in the forest”. Sure he could’ve been ace, but he could’ve also been autistic and missed all the usual neurotypical displays of affection, or maybe he just didn’t like how nobody seemed to like him for him and not his body, maybe he himself didn’t like anybody in his hometown.

My point is, the “Narcissus is ace” reading of the story is one of many, and sure we can play around with different interpretations and try to see different perspectives, it’s all good fun. But friend, you’re in a public forum presenting a niche interpretation of a famous story as if everybody was aware of it, and seemingly misinterpreting what the conversation is about overall because of it.

Nobody will say narcissism means asexuality without a supporting block of text to explain their position. When you see the word “narcissist” it’s going to mean “obsessed with self”, because the word has travelled through centuries and has been codified as such, a niche reading of the story from an ace’s perspective isn’t going to change that

would you mind giving me a quote then?

I read through the relevant parts and “narcissus is asexual” was certainly not the reading I had, and aside from maybe 2 lines I can’t see anyone reading it like that. Majority of the poem focuses on how he’s fallen in love with himself, that’s his defining trait (and when the reflection couldn’t love him back he died of sad). And that has nearly always been what people think when they hear “narcissist”: someone in love with themselves above all else

that is not what narcissism is, nor ever was? Man where did you get that info from? Get a refund

huh? narcissism =/= asexuality