![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprogramming.dev%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F15c9c78d-2924-41e6-b392-0dc0657ff24e.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprogramming.dev%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
Better to ask a rubber duck than an LLM.
It has better results, is cheaper, and makes has a positive compounding effect on your own abilities.
Better to ask a rubber duck than an LLM.
It has better results, is cheaper, and makes has a positive compounding effect on your own abilities.
Because: “The dose makes the poison”.
In other words, any chemical—even water and oxygen—can be toxic if too much is ingested or absorbed into the body. The toxicity of a specific substance depends on a variety of factors, including how much of the substance a person is exposed to, how they are exposed, and for how long.
For anyone downvoting this who didn’t understand the reference:
Russia is saying that they’re the ones shooting down their own planes, because they don’t want to admit that Ukraine has the capability to shoot down their planes.
Your question:
what things did the LHC discover that have real practical applications right now other than validating some hypothesis
Is really multiple questions:
Is doing fundamental research with no application in mind useful?
Has the LHC led to practical applications usable today
The answer to question 1 is yes.
There’s different types of research programs made to target different goals. Some aim for short or medium term applications, and others are just pure fundamental research.
Just because pure research doesn’t have an application in mind, doesn’t mean it’s not useful. The application isn’t the goal, the expansion of our knowledge base is. Everyone who ever thought up of an application for something did so based on their own knowledge base. If the knowledge base never expands, then we run out of applications to think up. This is why pure research is useful.
And all of history supports this:
The answer to question 2 is also yes:
The obvious ones are:
Not to give you a definitive answer, but you’d probably be really interested in Vale.
It’s still early days, but there’s a lot of clever ideas that most languages can’t take advantage of that you’d probably be really interested in.
There’s only one core developer (who is currently on a temporary medical break), but there’s a lot of programming language theory discussion in the discord.
“the means” in this case would be authoritarian repression.
“The means” always has to be something bad for the “ends” to try and justify reaching for “the means”.
I had no popus using uBlock Origin on Firefox
Looking back at history, it would lead to more propaganda and more support for going to war.
A population getting attacked only leads to that population wanting to an us vs them mentality and emotional knee-jerk reactions over rational responses.