![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.hogru.ch/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.ml%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fd3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
I imagine downvoting incorrect answers being pretty useful in this type of community, it’s nothing personal and as you said, it doesn’t mean anything. Though just not upvoting would be sufficient.
I imagine downvoting incorrect answers being pretty useful in this type of community, it’s nothing personal and as you said, it doesn’t mean anything. Though just not upvoting would be sufficient.
I’m not a developer. Just explaining why projects keep within their scope and don’t bloat their software with features, which in turn take more effort to maintain.
Hadn’t heard of that! I doubt many others have either.
Ugh and then CDPR used a genre as a name for their game, tarnishing it.
They have their scope. It’s a video transcoder. Programs are better suited to doing their job well rather than stretching themselves thin with loads of features.
Is this why everyone is antisocial online now? Nobody talks in games anymore :(
Guys, stop falling for the obvious bait in the comments.
Greece is the last place it should be held, the country is an absolute mess. It could honestly be split over Western Europe, countries like France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, UK. Places that have stadiums and such already, places that will still use any new infrastructure that is built.
Yeah, it should only be held in countries that have the required infrastructure in place, but the whole IOC is corrupt from top to bottom.
Halo 2 Anniversary should have kept the old sounds. A lot of the art was done in the shitty Halo 4 style too instead of the original Halo style. Blur absolutely smashed the cutscenes though.
I am fine with remasters, but most end up as remakes and are insults to the originals.
Just slap them on the wrist and send them on their way.
Only swim where there are lifeguards and never ever underestimate the ocean.
I think we are arguing the same point? Sorry if my wording was unclear or anything. You are very much correct.
Yeah, as an individual best interest, I meant that as a collective though.
For as long as FPTP voting exists and people won’t vote with their best interests in mind, you will be stuck with the least-worst option.
Stonehenge is a monument built thousands of years ago, way before humans started mass polluting the Earth, how is it relevant to climate change?
A monument built thousands and thousands of years ago has no correlation to current day pollution/climate change. I think you missed the context. They should be targeting polluters or protectors of polluters, not an innocent heritage site.
While it’s not damaged and will just wash off in the rain, they shouldn’t be doing this to irrelevant monuments. It’s getting nobody on your side.
Only if you care about it. I can see why people do care, but there’s really no need to, especially in this enviroment.