Theyre pretty fuckin interchangable

Oh, raw meat for sure. I wouldnt feed a pet raw anything unless I got a vets thumbs up, cooked is safer across the board.

I thought it meant meat, period.

Wait, is it bad to feed pigs meat? I thought they were natural omnivores. Is this about an issue of feeding them spoiled meat? Or is this the whole “feed a body to a pig” thing?

Cause if someones cleaning murders with pigs, they arent worried about its legality.

I get being frustrated, but this site is very obviously new, young, and actively trying to figure out its own established rules and expectations.

Having one single post removed because the mod realized they needed to clarify more about the content is not that big of a deal. This place is small and loosely established. The rules are not fully figured out yet.

Big overreaction to ragequit and leave salty messages on all your former posts

Is it that much of a blow to lose someone who rage quits over a teeny sub on a half empty website slowly growing its ruleset?

Not really the kind of guy I want to see content from, given how quickly he moved to trying to strongarm the mod

Nah fuck that guy, the new rule belongs.

There is a running cultural gag of mothers doing this to their own children. Which is a running gag because most people with siblings have had their parents do this in real life.

I dunno man, I think my mom loves me more than biden knows sitting presidents. It might just be a common memory glitch that human brains do

Maybe dont skim lemmy while drinking, youve misread this very very very hard

We are inherently violent in the sense that inherently, we need to understand violence.

We arent inherently violent in that we dont inherently choose violence before all else.

We need violence, evolutionarily, to hunt and to stop ourselves from being hunted. We are also a heavily social species, which requires ask first punch later mentalities.

If we were intrinsically violent, we wouldnt have cities. We wouldnt have even reached that level of collaboration before killing one another.

Human violence comes about, largely, due to aggression being the “safer” reaction to fear. Pre society, fear happens when threatened with death, and violence usually stops that. Be it death via hunger so violence kills a meal, or death via predator so violence defends you.

We still have that knee jerk response to fear, but now what scares us isnt actually a death threat. So we accidentally treat the unknown like it wants to kill us.

We arent intrinsically violent, we are too easily scared.

And you prevent fear of the unknown, typically, with education.

Or lose their salaries, as an employee who could have been doing campaign work is now stuck sifting through mail all day.

At that point the goal is to so entirely overwhelm the secretary that they become incapable of doing any real work, needing to wade through mail all day each day to make sure nothing of serious importance is missed in the sea of angry voters.

If you do it right, you actually waste the time of 2 or more employees on their weekly schedule. It literally costs them money to ignore you.

And hamas is not palestine. Any war crime committed by hamas doesnt justify the slaughter of random civilians living in the region, which is the criticism israel is getting from the entire planet.

Your fears are unfounded, and your quickness to jump to them is unsettling.

The US and UK rely on israel playing nice in order to maintain a base and foothold in the region.

If israel did or does anything that actually threatened either nation, the soft hand would firm up quickly. But to these leaders, the genocide of brown people is little more than a minor PR problem. Not an actually threatening problem for their countries. So they see no reason to risk their foothold.

That we allow religion to hold such massive sway is such a point of shame for our species, and out countries.

Thats a little bit got me hesitant to trust this.

All this guy does is think about war and war threats. Does that make him good at reading the room about war tensions? Probably. Does it also mean he is hypervigilant and overanalyzing every single thing and at risk of reading intent and threat into things where it isnt? Also probably.

Countries are always war tense somewhere, because someone is always pissing in someone elses pool. It doesnt always lead to war, especially when no one actually wants a war.

He had some weird medical issue that some people guess is cancer. But it just as easily could have been overly cautious covid protections for all the info that gets made public

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod