• 4 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle









  • zabadoh@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlI had a journey
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree somewhat.

    A lot of high tech development comes with a greed motive, e.g. IPO, or getting bought out by a large company seeking to enter the space, e.g. Google buying Android, or Facebook buying Instagram and Oculus.

    And conversely, a lot of open source software are copies of commercially successful products, albeit they only become widely adopted after the originals have entered the enshittified phase of their life.

    Is there a Lemmy without Reddit? Is there a Mastodon without Twitter? Is there LibreOffice without Microsoft Office and decades of commercial word processors and spreadsheets before that? Or OpenOffice becoming enshittified for that matter? Is there qBittorrent without uTorrent enshittified? Is there postgreSQL without IBM’s DB2?

    The exception that I can see is social media and networked services that require active network and server resources, like Facebook YouTube, or even Dropbox and Evernote.

    Okay, The WELL is still around and is arguably the granddaddy of all online services, and has avoided enshittification, but it isn’t really open source.




  • It’s been that way for a loooong time.

    Movies became so expensive to produce that studios can’t finance them themselves.

    So they turned to the banks.

    Banks are by nature risk averse.

    So a production company has to submit an application to their bank’s movie financing department like you would when applying for a home loan.

    The bank decides whether to finance the movie based on the information submitted: Script, subject matter, director, which stars have committed to the project, etc.

    Now if you imagine, people from the banking industry are not artists and creatives and visionaries. They just look at raw investment potential, i.e. Is this proposed production going to pay off the loan with interest?

    If there’s any risk, e.g. this has never been done before, or there’s no recognizable franchise branding, or if something could be controversial in a meaningful way, the bank won’t approve the production loan.

    So sequels, brand name franchises, with writing committees, are easier to get approvals from the banks, therefore are more likely to make it into production.

    That’s why Hollywood doesn’t make daring, experimental, and controversial movies much anymore.