• 4 Posts
  • 81 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle





  • So how would the judges be appointed under this system and why is it better than having them chosen from the people?

    By competition and diploma. A judge is a legal technician. Why elect him on political bases? We do not elect an engineer on political criteria, we take the one who seems the best among the candidates.

    If the current system hasn’t prevented political influence, then the method of choosing obviously isn’t guaranteeing unbiased judges anyway, so what’s the point in keeping it as opposed to elected judges?

    What’s the point to elect them?








  • Zloubida@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlA new country in the world!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s not the point. The point is: Ukraine is a normal country, nor a fascist hellhole nor a perfect Paradise. Their national symbol is also used by its far right, today and during the WWII; just like all other countries under the Nazi rule in Europe. And just like all other countries under the Nazi rule in Europe, they continued to use their national symbols after the WWII.




  • Zloubida@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlA new country in the world!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Symbols have more than one meaning… The word “fascism” comes from one of these symbols: the Fasces. However the fasces are still used by France:

    Or by the US:

    Are these countries fascists just because they use the Fasces? Of course not. They have other meanings. It’s the same with this Ukrainian symbol.







  • Zloubida@lemmy.worldtoAtheist Memes@lemmy.worldHow?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Atheists 🤝 Evangelicals

    Thinking that the Bible

    should be read literally

    More seriously, did you know that there are two Creation stories in the Bible (in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2) and that these two stories are contradictory? But the people who added the second story did not replace the first with their own. They did not mind that the two stories contradicted each other because they knew perfectly well that these stories were allegories and were not to be read as historical accounts to be interpreted literally. Those who insist on a literal reading do not respect the will of the authors, whether God exists and is the inspiration or not.