I recently watched the first two Godfather movies, and after a quick search I found out about the Godfather Saga (the 7-hour chronological cut). In your opinion, which way is the best to watch the first two Godfather movies? Do you prefer the 7-hour version with the additional scenes, or would you rather watch both movies separately? I found the Godfather Saga online, but unfortunately the quality is not that good… I’m still planning on watching it because who doesn’t like deleted scenes?

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the best version is to watch Godfather 1 and 2 followed by The Godfather Coda. Coppola re-edited the Godfather 3 and released it in 2020 as the Godfather Coda. The new version is much better and also fits better with the previous two films.

    • TheRTV@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Coda was really good. A much more fitting end to the trilogy. It made much more sense as a movie compared to the original edit. It’s too bad he didn’t have the time to do this originally

  • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I haven’t seen Saga, but I feel the chronological cut would lead to a loss of punch in the scenes with young Vito. Part of it is knowing where he ends up and what happens, and comparing that to his beginnings.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s almost like storytelling is a craft involving real care and skill, and when experienced directors and writers choose to tell a story in a particular way its usually for a good reason.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Chronological cuts are fun curiosities, but they rarely succeed. The intercutting between time periods reveals meaning in the parallels between disparate settings.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The chronological cut was a much-hyped “special television event” spread over two nights, and that’s what I first saw from a friend who taped it on VHS.

    Some years later, when I saw the original theatrical releases, I preferred them much more, as the De Niro/young Vito sequences work better in smaller segments, going back and forth to Michael in the 1950s and back, to put it all consecutively drags the pace from the very get-go.

    Also, the trip to Corleone, Sicily to exact revenge on don Ciccio works best as a parallel coda to the whole Fredo, Frankie “Five Angels” and Hyman Roth outcomes. The pacing just works that way.

    • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with all. I’ve only ever watched the originals in succession not this Chronicles of Godfather stuff. I think the theatrical release is the only way to watch.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, but the story is much more focused on Michael than in Godfather 3. I think the cuts that were chosen also served her better. Overall I did not really notice her performance, which was a big improvement over the earlier version.

  • FlyLikeAMouse@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I love them both but, if I’m being super-critical, then I’d say that Part II has better pacing and therefore “wins” on a standalone basis. If the new cut addresses this, then I might be open to a re-evaluation.